Skip to main content
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Title: Re: [gmf-dev] M2 build
Hi Anthony,
I hadn’t heard it was mandated, so I just sent out a note to the PMC list to see what the consensus is. I don’t have a problem adding it, as it seems more-or-less equivalent.
All set for M2 then?
Thanks,
Rich
On 9/30/08 9:46 AM, "Anthony Hunter" <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Richard,
It may be worthwhile to use the Galileo flag to match the rest of the modeling projects. We can even use the same type of queries they used to be consistent. I actually assumed all of modeling was going to do this, so I also made GEF use the Galileo flag ( http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=tools.gef )
Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GEF / GMF / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-270-4613
Richard Gronback ---09/30/2008 07:18:53 AM---Hi, I'd like to build and promote 2.2M2 today, so let me know if there are

From:
Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To:
"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:
09/30/2008 07:18 AM

Subject:
[gmf-dev] M2 build
Hi,
I'd like to build and promote 2.2M2 today, so let me know if there are
additional check-ins to be done.
Also, for the Galileo plan items, is there any interest in using the galileo
flag approach in Bugzilla, as is being done in MDT and other Modeling
projects? Or, are we happy to just rely on the 'plan' keyword?
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/Project_Plan/Modeling_Project
Thanks,
Rich
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
Back to the top