Thanks Anthony.  
 
I’ll update the feature.xml to
include this plug-in.  In case not everyone realizes it, when adding a
test plug-in, the required tasks are outlined here: http://www.eclipse.org/gmf/development/development_guidelines.html#Testing
 Of course, this not being a JUnit plug-in means it only needs to go in
the feature.xml and have a map file entry.
 
I notice another plug-in was added, but is
commented out: o.e.g.tests.runtime.emf.clipboard.core.  The tests seem to
run OK, but is not included in the build…   Can I add it,
Vishy?
 
Best,
Rich
 
From:
gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Hunter
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005
1:19 PM
To: GMF
 Project developer discussions.
Subject: Re: [gmf-dev] new
Integration build
 
 
Hi Richard, 
We
just added org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.common.ui.services.provider which is a
plug-in used by org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.common.ui to test delayed plug-in
loading when loading service providers (Bug 112797) and handling provider  exceptions
(114759). 
I
updated the tests map file, let me know if it is OK. 
Note
that org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.common.ui.services.provider is not a JUnit
tests plugin, as indicated by a comment in it's AllTests: 
public class AllTests {
             
  /**
             
   * The org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.common.ui.services.provider
tests
             
   * plug-in is not a JUnit test plug-in. This plug-in is used by
             
   * org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.common.ui for
ProviderPolicyExceptionsTest
             
   * and ProviderPolicyTest.
             
   */
} 
Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Manager - Software Developer, 
IBM Rational Software: Aurora Core Common / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-591-7037
 
  | "Richard Gronback"
  <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent
  by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
 11/07/2005 04:07 PM  
   
    | Please
    respond to"GMF Project developer discussions."
    <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 |  
 | 
   
    | To | "GMF Project
     developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
    "GMF Release List"
    <gmf-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>  |  
    | cc |   |  
    | Subject | [gmf-dev] new Integration build |    
 | 
Hi All, 
 
I have
rebuilt and posted the latest integration build with process affinity set to
just one of the machine’s CPUs to test a theory regarding our test hangs.
 It seems to have worked, as all tests passed with no hangups J.
 Also, I wanted to test our build procedure for repeated builds using tag
I20051106-0900. 
 
http://download.eclipse.org/technology/gmf/downloads/drops/I-I20051107-200511071200/index.php
 
Thanks,
Rich
 
 
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation 
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215 
 _______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev