Thanks Anthony!
From:
gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Hunter
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005
5:44 PM
To: GMF
Project developer discussions.
Subject: [gmf-dev] RE:
[gmf-releng] GMF: last nights build...
Hi Richard,
I
implemented the new Eclipse 3.2 method so that the 3.2 build will work.
The
new method has no effect in Eclipse 3.1.1 so it is backward compatible,
We
are going to remove this plug-in very soon, but this fix will do for now.
Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Manager - Software Developer,
IBM Rational Software: Aurora Core Common / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-591-7037
|
"Richard Gronback"
<Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent
by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
11/04/2005 01:54 AM
|
Please
respond to
"GMF Project developer discussions."
<gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"GMF Release List" <gmf-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "GMF Project developer discussions."
<gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
RE: [gmf-releng] RE: [gmf-dev] GMF: last
nights build...
|
|
The UML2 weekly integration build isn’t
available yet, so I targeted the following configuration:
- uml2-I200510270942.zip
- eclipse-SDK-I20051102-1600-win32.zip
- emf-sdo-runtime-I200511030200.zip
- GEF-runtime-I20051103.zip
It seems the same compilation problem is preventing our
production of an integration build:
Severity
Description
Resource In
Folder
Location Creation
Time Id
2 The
type PathVariableManager must implement the inherited abstract method
IPathVariableManager.resolveURI(URI)
PathVariableManager.java
org.eclipse.gmf.runtime.common.ui.pathvariables.ide/src/org/eclipse/gmf/runtime/common/ui/pathvariables/ide/internal
line 45 November 3, 2005 11:47:46 PM 56326
/**
* Core's implementation of IPathVariableManager.
* <p>
* Code taken from Eclipse while waiting for bugzilla
49149 to be resolved.
*/
Perhaps we should update our copy? ;-)
Thanks,
Rich
From:
gmf-releng-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gmf-releng-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Frederic Plante
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 7:34 PM
To: GMF Release List
Subject: Re: [gmf-releng] RE: [gmf-dev] GMF: last nights build...
Hi Rich,
Should we retarget to last night's integration build?
Thanks
- Fred
_________________________________
Frédéric Plante
Rational Software, IBM Software Group
770 Palladium Drive, Ottawa,
ON, Canada
tel: (613) 591-7034
|
"Richard Gronback"
<Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: gmf-releng-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
11/03/2005 01:26 PM
|
Please
respond to
GMF Release List
|
|
|
To
|
"GMF Project
developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
gmf-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
|
Subject
|
[gmf-releng] RE: [gmf-dev] GMF: last nights
build...
|
|
I’m pushing the build up now, and rebuilding again… I’ll push
that one up when it’s done as well.
I’ve not let CruiseControl run freely lately due to repeated CVS timeouts
(and test hangs). When these are resolved, I’ll put it back on
automatic.
Thanks,
Rich
From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Steven Shaw
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 4:38 PM
To: gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gmf-dev] GMF: last nights build...
Last nights build doesn't appear to have run? If it did run, there was an
eroneous change made for bugzilla 114746 that has been subsequently rolled
back. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=114746
(my fault entirely)
Is it possible to spin another build around lunch time?
-Steve
________________________________________
Steven R. Shaw
Rational Modeling Platform Diagram Layer Lead
Rational Software | IBM Software Group
770 Palladium Drive, Kanata,
ON, Canada,
K2V 1C8
tel: 613.591.7979
steveshaw@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________
gmf-releng mailing list
gmf-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-releng_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
