| That would be awesome, thanks! 
 
 On 05/17/2017 10:41 AM, Diethard
      Steiner wrote:
 
      
      Ok, thanks for clarifying. I wait for your commit next week
        then. Please let me know when ready ... I am also preparing a
        blog post/tutorial on this, so this can be beneficial for more
        users. 
        
          
          Probably the tutorial was originally written under an earlier
          indexing scheme. We used to be more lenient in how we indexed
          values - we would treat values greater than 180 as 180.
          However, this lead to some users having unexpected results, so
          we decided to fail early. 
          Thanks,
           
          Emilio
          
           On 05/17/2017 10:07 AM, Diethard
            Steiner wrote:
 
            
            Hi Emilio, 
 Thanks a lot for your reply! It would be great if you
              could look into this next week. Since this shapefile is reference in the GeoMesa Spark
              Jupyter tutorial, I am a bit surprised ingestion doesn't
              work. Maybe the reason for this is that I am using the
              simplified shapefile as opposed to the normal one. I will
              try the latter one as soon as I find time and report back. 
 I also tried to open the simplified shapefile in QGIS
              and it was displayed just fine. 
 Best regards, Diethard 
              
                
                Hi Diethard, 
                From the exception, it looks like there are some
                polygons in the shapefile that are outside the lat/lon
                bounds of [-90, 90] and [-180, 180]. When we encounter
                coordinates like that we fail the indexing as invalid.
                 
                It's also possible that there are some subtle precision
                errors going on, since the coordinates are very close to
                180. I'm not sure if that would be coming from the
                shapefile or something in our processing.
                 
                I think for a quick fix, in our shapefile ingestion code
                we should be ingesting the features one at a time,
                instead of all at once. This would allow us to skip any
                polygons that have invalid coordinates, but still ingest
                the rest of the shapefile:
                
                https://github.com/locationtech/geomesa/blob/master/geomesa-utils/src/main/scala/org/locationtech/geomesa/utils/geotools/GeneralShapefileIngest.scala#L91 
                As an example, in our non-shapefile ingest code we
                ingest features one at a time:
                
                https://github.com/locationtech/geomesa/blob/master/geomesa-tools/src/main/scala/org/locationtech/geomesa/tools/ingest/AbstractIngest.scala#L125-L138 
                I don't think I have time to look into it this week, but
                verifying the CRS and coordinates in the shapefile would
                also be a good idea. I should have time next week if
                it's not resolved by then.
                 
                Thanks,
                 
                Emilio
                
                 On 05/16/2017 06:23 PM,
                  Diethard Steiner wrote:
 
                  
                    
                      Thanks a lot Jim and Emilio for your replies!
 
 
                      I quickly tried without specifying the
                      feature/schema:
                       
                      geomesa ingest -u root -p password \ 
                        -c myNamespace.countries -f shapeFile
                      TM_WORLD_BORDERS_SIMPL-0.3.shp
                      
                     And I get following error: 
                      ERROR requirement failed: Values out of bounds
                      ([-180.0 180.0] [-90.0 90.0]): [-180.0
                      180.00000190734863] [-90.0 -60.54722595214844] 
                      java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: requirement
                      failed: Values out of bounds ([-180.0 180.0]
                      [-90.0 90.0]): [-180.0 180.00000190734863] [-90.0
                      -60.54722595214844] 
                          at scala.Predef$.require(Predef.scala:219) 
                          at org.locationtech.geomesa.curve.XZ2SFC.org $locationtech$geomesa$curve$XZ2SFC$$normalize(XZ2SFC.scala:321) 
                          at
                      org.locationtech.geomesa.curve.XZ2SFC.index(XZ2SFC.scala:55) 
                          at
org.locationtech.geomesa.index.index.XZ2Index$$anonfun$toIndexKey$1.apply(XZ2Index.scala:124)
                      
                    It's quite late over here now ... so I'll only
                      have a chance to check your reply tomorrow. Thanks
                      in advance for your help!
 
 Best regards,
 Diethard
 _______________________________________________
geomesa-users mailing list
geomesa-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/geomesa-users 
              
             
 
 _______________________________________________
geomesa-users mailing list
geomesa-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/geomesa-users 
        
       
 
 _______________________________________________
geomesa-users mailing list
geomesa-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/geomesa-users 
 |