Re: AW: AW: [geclipse-dev] [Fwd: gEclipse - voms proxy creation exceptio

[Mariusz Wojtysiak <mariusz.wojtysiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Stuempert, Mathias IWR pisze:


> > Shouldn't we just ignore additional nodes in the response?
>
> Should it accept all
> non-parsable characters, or maybe only unknown items, or should it only
> accept approved and valid code?

I may imagine that in the future VOMS server response will contain 
additional information. It would be better g-Eclipse were forward 
compatible with next VOMS versions :-)

We can think about logging that new nodes appeared in voms response. But 
is it interesting for user? Is it interesting for us?

For current case additional node <version> I think is not useful both 
for the user and for us.

So I would just ignore extra nodes without logging.

--
Regards,
Mariusz Wojtysiak