[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [geclipse-dev] JUnit Tests
|
Hi all
I just want to highlight another interesting number beside the general
statement from Mathias!
1. We need definitely more tests and a more systematic test coverage
approach!
2. When looking on the webpage, I recognized, that the whole test suite
needed approx 40 sec to complete it's tests.
(Is this correct, Ariel??)
More than 25% of this time is used by just one test package (namely
eu.geclipse.globus.resources).
When we remind ourselves, how long a job submission to the gLite resource
broker always needs,
I'm really surprised by the small overall time of most of the tests.
Are we just testing the classes, that do not interact with the Grid at all?
WE NEED MORE TESTS!
Harald
==========================================
Dr. Harald Kornmayer
Senior researcher
NEC Laboratories Europe
IT Division
Rathausallee 10
D-53757 Sankt Augustin
Germany
Phone: +49 2241 92 52 57
Fax: +49 2241 92 52 99
Email: harald.kornmayer@xxxxxxxxxxxx
NEC Europe Ltd., Registered Office: NEC House,
1 Victoria Road, London W3 6bL,
Registered in England 2832014
==========================================
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: geclipse-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>[mailto:geclipse-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>>Stuempert, Mathias IWR
>>Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 10:00 AM
>>To: Developer mailing list
>>Subject: [geclipse-dev] JUnit Tests
>>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>>I just had a look at the test results and there integration
>>into the nightly build.
>>
>>
>>
>>First of all I would like to thank Jie for the provision of
>>the test framework and the provision of a lot of the already
>>existing tests!
>>
>>
>>
>>Second I would like to thank Ariel and Markus for integrating
>>the tests into the nightly build, looks really good!
>>
>>
>>
>>But of course now I also have some questions and comments :)
>>
>>
>>
>>Ariel, you said most of the tests currently fail. Well, at
>>the very first page it is stated, that more than 75% of the
>>tests were successful, so for me it seems that most of the
>>tests are successful, or am I misunderstanding something?
>>
>>
>>
>>Furthermore the first page tells me that we currently have
>>272 tests. Does that include really ALL tests (SVN, CVS,
>>Core, PDE, local, Grid, .)? Furthermore the bottom left frame
>>contains a bit more than 100 test classes. Also here is that
>>really the full list of tests? If I remember it correctly we
>>have something like 3000+ classes in the framework (Does that
>>number also take into account interfaces and auto-generated
>>code?). So if this is all correct we have a very low test coverage.
>>
>>
>>
>>For me the conclusion is that we really have to provide more
>>tests now! So every developer, please check if you are
>>testing your classes properly! And if you find out that you
>>do not, please add appropriate tests!
>>
>>
>>
>>Cheers, Mathias
>>
>>
