| Re: AW: [geclipse-dev] Survey from JSDL WG |
Hi, I've added my 2 cents to Wizard description.There's also one thing that caused problems with JSDL, but it's about JSDL -> JDL translation (which cannot handle data staging elements without source or target specified), so it's not our problem, right? Or should we mention we have problems with interpreting that kind of data staging elements?
KasiaDnia 05-10-2007 o 13:12:43 Harald Kornmayer <harald.kornmayer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
Hi all, Hi Nicholas I attached my comments in the document. I hope you can deal with the open office stuff. For the sake of success, I attached a PDF as well. Harald On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 11:43 +0300, Nicholas Loulloudes wrote:Ooups sorry. I attached by mistake a wrong document. (Too many g-Eclipse documents on my desktop) Please find, attached now the correct JSDL survey document. Thanks. Nicholas Loulloudes wrote: > Hi all, >> I attach the JSDL survey document with some initial contributions by me.> > I have added a small description for g-Eclipse and the use of JSDL > within the g-Eclipse framework. Furthermore, i have marked all > implemented JSDL features in regard to the JSDL editor. > > Kasia, Pawel, Mariusz could you please append your own comments / > suggestions to the survey document. > > Anyone else who would like to have a look at the document and provide > its suggestions, please feel free to do so. > > Best regads, > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------> > _______________________________________________ > geclipse-dev mailing list > geclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/geclipse-dev _______________________________________________ geclipse-dev mailing list geclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/geclipse-dev
Attachment:
JSDL experience survey 0.2.odt
Description: Binary data