[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [europa-build-workshop] Re: CBI (was: Re: EMFT, ECF, and Common Build Infrastructure)
|
is Continuum open source and written in java, ant, php or shell? If
it's anything else I wouldn't feel comfortable using it... I only
speak a handful of languages. ;-)
Cheers,
Nick
On 11/29/06, John Casey <jcasey@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sorry, I guess I'd lost track of this thread, but I'd like to chip in my
> $0.02 anyhow...
>
> I think Pete Mackie may have mentioned this at one point, but have you
> guys thought about Continuum at all? It looks like what you're doing
> here is a lot like an advanced continuous integration setup. If
> Continuum could get you 80% there, it might be worth writing/refactoring
> the web UI to call Continuum, rather than reinvent the wheel...
>
> I didn't understand how similar these cases were, until I saw Andrew's
> whiteboard pic. :)
>
> What do you think?
>
> -john
>
> Nick Boldt wrote:
> > Your attached image looks a lot like what's been in my head for the last
> > few weeks. ;-)
> >
> > I need to set up a lot of that just for maintaining the Modeling projects.
> > My primary goal of course is to make MY life easier, with the longer term
> > goal of making it easier for others too. Once it's stable and in use by all
> > the projects, I'd be happy to float it out to the community or to Denis or
> > whoever wants to take a crack at some of the maintenance of it, so that
> > it's not just on my shoulders. If it becomes something that's run at the
> > foundation (like the committer tools at dev.eclipse.org), that would make
> > it all the more available for smaller projects to adopt.
> >
> > Not sure that answers your question, though. ;-)
> >
> > --
> > Nick Boldt :: Release Engineer, IBM Toronto Lab
> > Eclipse Modeling :: http://www.eclipse.org/modeling
> > http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/User:Nickb
> >
> >
> >
> > Andrew Overholt
> > <overholt@redhat.
> > com> To
> > Nick Boldt/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> > 11/27/06 04:36 PM cc
> > Europa Build Workshop
> > <europa-build-workshop@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Please respond to Subject
> > Andrew Overholt CBI (was: Re: EMFT, ECF, and Common
> > <overholt@redhat. Build Infrastructure)
> > com>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2006-27-11 at 13:22 -0500, Nick Boldt wrote:
> >> Regarding CBI, my plan for Modeling has been to wait until
> >> build.eclipse.org was ready to go (migration to SLES10 completed over
> >> the weekend), then start migrating our infrastructure to there,
> >> centralizing and streamlining as I go. Here's an outline of the plan:
> >
> > Cool. So should we even say anything to the Foundation? When we were
> > in Portland, I was envisioning something close to the attached image.
> > That's roughly based on Red Hat's current build system. IMHO the
> > Foundation would be offering a great service to the community by
> > implementing, maintaining, and documenting/helping others with such a
> > system. But perhaps I'm in the minority. If so, I'm not even sure if
> > it's worth writing any sort of report since there would be little for
> > the Foundation to do outside of Denis' current work.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Andrew
> > (See attached file: CBI.jpg)(See attached file: signature.asc)
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > europa-build-workshop mailing list
> > europa-build-workshop@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/europa-build-workshop
>
> _______________________________________________
> europa-build-workshop mailing list
> europa-build-workshop@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/europa-build-workshop
>
