Re: [equinox-dev] [Bug 531680] [code mining] Avoid cancellation by excep

["Daniel Megert" <daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> (Moved
discussion from bug to Equinox mailing list)

Why? I prefer
to keep discussions in bug reports.

And, it would
not be an Equinox specific question/issue.

Dani



From:
       Gunnar
Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
       equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:
       30.07.2018
18:00
Subject:
       Re:
[equinox-dev] [Bug 531680] [code mining] Avoid cancellation by    
   exception
Sent
by:        equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

(Moved discussion from bug to Equinox
mailing list)

>> As for the other comments, is introducing this as a new default
method on
>> IProgressMonitor and coordinating a release with fixes upstream
possible? Or
>> will that never allowed?
> 
> Following the rules as they are now that would require a major version
> increase.  Not something I think is justified to fix this issue.

What are the general plans here? I'd like to see the specific issue fixed
in a good way. Having the new default method on IProgressMonitor seems
like a clean approach. However, I tend to agree that this is a big change
(in terms of impact).

Are there any plans to have another major version? What are the main concerns
in that area?

-Gunnar
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev