> Should I open an enhancement request to
add a REMOTE type and attach a
> patch to contribute an addition/change? (e.g.):
I will open a bug in OSGi to fix that. In the interim
just use the numerical value 5.
> One question: does this framework change
appear somewhere else in the
> r4.2 spec? (i.e. other than 119)? As it seems to imply that
> isn't stand-alone (that is, it requires this small addition to framework).
119 relies on come changes in 4.2 (e.g. ServiceHooks).
ServiceException is one of them.
> Are there conventions about this (placement)
that dictate what
> package(s) these interfaces should be in? If so, where is that?
These should already be in one of the jars from OSGi.