[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Download manager support for pack200
|
Just out of curiosity, why do you use the external binary to do the
pack/unpack and not the java.util.jar.Pack200 class? It seems to me that
a fragment that is EE dependent (require Java 1.5 or higher) would be
ideal here. Those who run lower then Java 5 simply would not have
pack200 which is kind of natural isn't it?
- thomas
Jeff McAffer wrote:
right but there is the practical detail that the exe you need comes
with Java 5 or later and the licensing does not likely allow you to
ship just the unpack200 exe. But that is a matter for someone's legal
team. As John says, the unpack support simply cares whether or not
the exe is there.
What we really need is an open source implementation of unpack that
runs on/with Foundation...
Jeff
John Arthorne wrote:
Just to clarify, the JRE level doesn't matter here. Unpack is
performed by a standalone unpack200 executable that doesn't require
presence of a JVM. You can run with a Foundation class library, plus
a standalone unpack200 executable from Java 5 or Java 6.
*Jim Colson <jccolson@xxxxxxxxxx>*
Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
01/24/2008 09:18 PM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To
Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Download manager support for pack200
how would that work on J2ME (CDC/Foundatoin)?
________________________________________
Jim Colson, Chief Architect - IBM Client Software
Distinguished Engineer
IBM Academy of Technology
Board Member - IT Architect Certification
11501 Burnet Rd. Austin, TX 78758
Ph 512-823-7357, Fax 512-838-0962
email: jccolson@xxxxxxxxxx
Admin: Sandra Wallis 512-838-3241
email: swallis@xxxxxxxxxx
From:
Pascal Rapicault <Pascal_Rapicault@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:
Equinox development mailing list
<equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
01/24/2008 08:11 PM
Subject:
[equinox-dev] [prov] Download manager support for pack200
I seem to remember that someone was working on adding to support to our
download manager to favor downloading pack200'ed artifacts over
canonical
ones.
Did that ever made it into the code?
Thx
PaScaL
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev