[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security
- From: "Remy Chi Jian Suen" <remy.suen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:21:01 -0400
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=llk9E9EwB0OZHO9JVSiC71DUsjDoim18IKz+cHHZJQNsDPMtRGw5IisU2Qd0xHf6GWZQ0EmkpwAy97SJp/drlMadWaBas0H2WCnGGDOShIc/F8ck7MyL9zmJ/xwuFmZshgZ3aCVwuO7030/tGdOd9SBlUCE+pdxsXmky17gktnA=
On 10/31/07, Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Right, so bundles that require those packages to compile or run would have
> to specify EE of JRE 1.4 (or higher)...in other words they can't specifiy
> 1.1 and be assured of getting those optional packages. Please correct if
> this is wrong in any way.
Well, you could just declare an Import-Package and get by with that.
If they don't have a bundle that exports that package then your
consumers are out of luck. eRCP's bundles has Import-Package
"statements" (or whatever the appropriate word in OSGi speak is) for