[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [equinox-dev] Using the Configuration Admin Service?

What I would like to see from this illustrious body is synergy between the
two.   If there are shortcomings in Config Admin then we should use this
forum to gather some requirements and feed them back into the OSGi so that
Eclipse can utilize Config Admin as well as other "non-Eclipse" users of
the Equinox OSGi implementation.

Do others agree with this?


Jim Colson, Chief Architect - IBM Client Software
Distinguished Engineer
IBM Academy of Technology
Board Member - IT Architect Certification

11501 Burnet Rd. Austin, TX 78758
Ph 512-823-7357, Fax 512-838-0962
email: jccolson@xxxxxxxxxx

Admin:  Christine Willis 512-838-3667
email:  Christine_Willis@xxxxxxxxxx

             @IBMUS                                                     To 
             Sent by:                  Equinox development mailing list    
             equinox-dev-bounc         <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>           
             es@xxxxxxxxxxx                                             cc 
             01/10/2006 06:36          RE: [equinox-dev] Using the         
             PM                        Configuration Admin Service?        
             Please respond to                                             
               mailing list                                                

Simon, John,
             Currently there are no plans to contribute a Configuration
Admin implementation to Equinox.  The direction Eclipse is taking is to use
the Eclipse Preferences to store configuration data.  The Eclipse
Preferences API is much simpler to use then Configuration Admin.  It is
also easier to manage and more widely used.

The OSGi Preferences Service can also be used to store configuration data
(the implementation in Equinox simply wrappers the Eclipse Preferences).
Although, it is important to note that the OSGi Preferences Service does
not have any notifications when a value has changed.  The Eclipse
Preferences, however, does provide these notifications.

Jennifer Fogell
OSGi Services Lead
IBM Device Software Development

  "John Wells"                                                            
  <jwells@xxxxxxx>                     To:        "Equinox development    
  Sent by:                     mailing list" <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>    
  equinox-dev-bounces@eclipse.         cc:                                
  org                                  Subject:        RE: [equinox-dev]  
                               Using the Configuration Admin Service?     
  01/10/2006 02:51 PM                                                     
  Please respond to Equinox                                               
  development mailing list                                                

Iâve been waiting for the Configuration Admin bundle from Equinox for a
while now.  I wish it were here.  What is the status of it?

In particular, I need the interaction between the ConfiguraitonAdmin
service and the DeclarativeServices service.  So I hope it is well
integrated when it happens.

In the short run, you can actually use the Configuration Admin service
available from www.knopflerfish.org

I have tested it (shortly) inside the Equinox framework and it seems to
work ok.  However, I have not done any exhaustive testing.

John Wells (Aziz)

From: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kaegi, Simon
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 2:57 PM
To: equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [equinox-dev] Using the Configuration Admin Service?

Hi all,

I've been doing some investigation in to how Eclipse and its various
components get configured.
>From what I've seen, this is done primarily through System properties and
I'm looking at alternatives for a variety of reasons. (see bug 105851, but
I can definitely add other concerns)

OSGi gives us the Configuration Admin Service and I'm wondering if using it
might be a better approach for non-system bundle configuration information.

By this I guess I'm proposing that the Config Admin Service be integrated
at a fairly low level in Eclipse and then used for all plugins/bundles that
need configuration instead of System properties.

Once the Configuration Admin service is available I'm happy to do the work,
but before I get started I'm curious as to whether people think this
approach is reasonable.


     This message may contain privileged and/or confidential information.
If you have received this e-mail in error or are not the intended
recipient, you may not use, copy, disseminate or distribute it; do not open
any attachments, delete it immediately from your system and notify the
sender promptly by e-mail that you have done so.  Thank you.
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev mailing list