I agree it would be better to publish
it, the benefit to keep those "hidden" seems less important to me
for a .1 release in regard to wider testing.
Cédric
Le 15/09/2017 à 11:09, Markus Knauer a écrit :
Thanks to the availability of a machine for Mac OS
signing & dmg file creation, we could re-enable
building for this platform!
As always, I'm asking for testing and +1 votes for this
build.
Second, we never published the last release candidate
(RC4) so far because this would mean releasing early. But
this time we had so many problems during the RC phase, and
if we were able to deliver at all, it was late and most of
the time incomplete (i.e. no Mac OS packages). Because of
that reason I'd be interested in your opinion whether we
should made these RC4 packages available on the developers
build tab of the download page in order to increase the
chance to find potential issues before the final release
date.
What do you think?
Thanks and regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
epp-dev mailing list
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev
--
Cédric
Brun
CTO
+33
2 51 13 51 42
@bruncedric
![]()
7 Boulevard Ampère - Carquefou -
France
obeo.fr | twitter | linkedin
|