[epl-discuss] [Topic] Definition of Contributor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[epl-discuss] [Topic] Definition of Contributor

From: "Mike Milinkovich" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:15:28 -0400
Delivered-to: epl-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/epl-discuss>
List-help: <mailto:epl-discuss-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epl-discuss>, <mailto:epl-discuss-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/epl-discuss>, <mailto:epl-discuss-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eclipse Foundation
Thread-index: Ac5m18HOvcDWorT8TC+xFuTRrGxQMw==

The EPL’s definition of Contributor is:

"Contributor" means any person or entity that distributes the Program.

This clearly works, but for the sake of clarity we may want to consider an alternate construction. For example, would it help readability if the defined term was “Distributor”?

Mike Milinkovich

Executive Director

Eclipse Foundation

mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx

+1.613.220.3223 mobile

+1.613.224.9461 x228 office

@mmilinkov

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [epl-discuss] [Topic] Definition of Contributor
  - From: Doug Schaefer

Prev by Date: [epl-discuss] [Topic] Copyleft provisions are not obvious
Next by Date: Re: [epl-discuss] [Topic] Definition of Contributor
Previous by thread: [epl-discuss] [Topic] Copyleft provisions are not obvious
Next by thread: Re: [epl-discuss] [Topic] Definition of Contributor
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs