Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[epf-dev] Vote on new Committers - Batch2


Hi,

we need to vote on new committers, batch 2. We need 3 yes, and no veto to accept a new committer.
I am voting yes through this e-mail.

If there are other people that expect to become committers, but are not on the list below, please send me a note asap and we will do one more vote. I do not want to vote on people that are still iffy on whether they will be committers or not, and I know many organizations are still finalizing who should be a committer.

The following people have voting rights (and no others need to reply):
- Peter Haumer
- Ricardo Balduino
- Jim Thario
- Per Kroll
- Charlie Yan
- Kelvin Low
- Jao Tham
We need +3 of you to respond with Yes. You can also Obstain or Veto. If you veto, you need to provide a reason for your veto within 24 hours, or your veto is ignored.
<The people that were voted on last week has not yet become confirmed committers, and does hence not yet have the right to vote. I am filing the forms (#3 on http://www.eclipse.org/legal/newcommitter.php) for you today, and if you have done #2, and #4, it should only take a few more days.>

- Kurt Sand - Telelogic
- Chris Sibbald - Telelogic
- Brian Haughton – BearingPoint
- Bruce MacIsaac - IBM
- Jim Ruehlin - IBM
- Todd Fredrickson - IBM
- Naveena Bereny - IBM
- Scott Ambler - AmbySoft
- DJ de Villiers - Ivar Jacobson International


Again, if you expected your name here, and it is not, it is because I am still uncertain of whether you are firm as a committer. Please send me a note confirming that you should be a committer.
For those in Europe that has expressed interest, but have not yet had a chance to become fully engaged, we may wait until you had a chance to attend the March 6-7 meeting before making you committers.

Thanks

Per Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
408-342-3815

Back to the top