[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [emft-dev] Re: [modeling-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Lucas Bigeardel
|
Hi,
any update concerning issue raised about EMFT component voting/records ?
I would need to integrate some of my work to EMFT ecoretools component
and would need plain commiter rights for that.
Is there a chance to have this issue processed before 3.4M4+3w or
should I workaround my releng stuff until having this fixed later
3.4M5+ ?
cheers,
On 30/11/2007, Anne Jacko <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Ed--thanks. I've forwarded the stuff to Karl for his attention on
> Monday. Have a nice weekend!
>
> Anne Jacko
> Development Process Operations
> Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
> anne.jacko@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 503-784-3788
>
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:04 PM, Ed Merks wrote:
>
> > Anne,
> >
> > Thanks for the update. I'll wait patiently. The port is really
> > helping
> > to stream line the processes so it's worth it to iron out the
> > wrinkles...
> >
> >
> > Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> > mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
> > 905-413-3265 (t/l 313)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Anne Jacko
> > <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > To
> > 11/30/2007 02:54 Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> >
> > PM cc
> > modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
> > emf-dev
> > <emf-dev
> > %.eclipse.org@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> > emft-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx,
> > bjorn.freeman-
> > benson@xxxxxxxxxxx,
> > "Sharon Corbett"
> > <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Subject
> > Re: [modeling-pmc] PMC approval
> > needed for committer vote
> > for Lucas
> > Bigeardel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Ed et al,
> >
> > Karl was working on this, and he's not back in the office until
> > Monday. I know that he was looking at EMFT records in the Portal and
> > database to try and get everything in order, but I'm not sure of the
> > current status of what he was doing. If we can wait until Monday when
> > Karl can take a look at this, that would be best. He has the best
> > visibility to what happens in the Portal.
> >
> > Thanks for following the processes and being patient... the component
> > process is new and we found ourselves needing to change the system to
> > accommodate components earlier than we had planned for, which is why
> > it's been a bit rocky.
> >
> > Anne Jacko
> > Development Process Operations
> > Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
> > anne.jacko@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > 503-784-3788
> >
> >
> >
> > On Nov 30, 2007, at 4:00 AM, Ed Merks wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I hate to be a stickler for processes but if we don't follow them
> >> properly
> >> it will just likely bite us latter. I believe we have been
> >> following the
> >> processes carefully, including the excellent new improved process for
> >> provisioning a new components, but despite that, the portal records
> >> are a
> >> little out of whack. I opened this bugzilla a few days ago:
> >>
> >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=211046
> >>
> >> Unfortunately the only activity so far has been Sharon asking
> >>
> >> Hi Ed: Regarding this bug?.I?m a bit confused about it. Would
> >> this be
> >> Modelling?s effort on the refactoring front or?
> >>
> >> To which I replied:
> >>
> >> This is all simply trying to get the records to match all the
> >> paper work
> >> we've filed for the last few months. If you check your records
> >> for each
> >> of these committers it will confirm that they were elected to
> >> exactly
> >> these components. You can also confirm that we sent
> >> announcements for
> >> the creation the components themselves and you can confirm that
> >> they
> >> exist is CVS by virtue of having followed the processes to
> >> create them
> >> Somehow the records in the portal have failed to keep pace...
> >>
> >> I'm trying the best I can to follow the processes and to keep the EMO
> >> informed about discrepancies in the records the come from those
> >> processes.
> >> At this point, with the "invalid" vote just completed, I need some
> >> guidance
> >> as to how to proceed. I.e., before I approve this vote, I want to be
> >> absolutely clear that only the three ecoretools committers were
> >> eligible to
> >> vote and that the results of the election gives Lucas access to
> >> only the
> >> ecoretools component. If necessary I can veto this result and we
> >> can call
> >> a new election but given that I'm not sure the portal records are
> >> in place
> >> so that David can nominate Lucas for the ecoretools component I'm
> >> reluctant
> >> to do that; in fact, I'm pretty sure the records aren't fixed
> >> because this
> >> link still yields incomplete/incorrect results:
> >>
> >> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/lists.php?
> >> list=byproject¶m=modeling.emft
> >>
> >> If I do veto the vote, I want to be sure the EMF/EMFT developers
> >> understand
> >> the reason. I'd certainly like this to proceed quickly.
> >>
> >>
> >> Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> >> mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> 905-413-3265 (t/l 313)
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Forwarded by Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM on 11/30/2007 06:42 AM -----
> >>
> >> emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> (portal on behalf
> >> of
> >> emo) To
> >> Sent by: modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> modeling-pmc-
> >> boun cc
> >> ces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> Subject
> >> [modeling-pmc] PMC approval
> >> needed
> >> 11/30/2007 12:00 for committer vote for Lucas
> >> AM Bigeardel
> >>
> >>
> >> Please respond to
> >> PMC members
> >> mailing list
> >> <modeling-pmc@ecl
> >> ipse.org>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> modeling PMC Members,
> >> This automatically generated message marks the completion of voting
> >> for
> >> Lucas Bigeardel's Committer status on the modeling.emft project. As
> >> a PMC
> >> member, you can approve or disapprove this vote through your My
> >> Foundation
> >> portal page:
> >>
> >> http://portal.eclipse.org/
> >>
> >> Lucas Bigeardel was nominated by David Sciamma as follows:
> >> According to the last Modeling PMC meeting, I would like to
> >> nominate Lucas
> >> as a new Ecore Tools Committer (see
> >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=209718).
> >> Lucas is the leader of EMF Search component and is offering to
> >> contribute
> >> an Ecore Search implementation to Ecore Tools component. To
> >> maintain and
> >> develop this contribution, Lucas need to be an Ecore Tools committer.
> >> Please vote for this nomination.
> >>
> >>
> >> Vote summary: 14/0/0 with 19 pending
> >> +1 Freddy Allilaire
> >> ? Chris Aniszczyk
> >> ? Lucas Bigeardel
> >> ? Nick Boldt
> >> ? Cédric Brun
> >> +1 Sandro Böhme
> >> +1 Joel Cheuoua
> >> +1 Christopher Daly
> >> ? Stephan Eberle
> >> +1 Sven Efftinge
> >> ? Paul Elder
> >> +1 Peter Friese
> >> ? Miguel Garcia
> >> ? Laurent Goubet
> >> ? Arno Haase
> >> +1 Bernd Kolb
> >> +1 Jacques Lescot
> >> ? Ma Li
> >> +1 Ed Merks
> >> +1 Jonathan Musset
> >> +1 Peter Nehrer
> >> ? Marcelo Paternostro
> >> +1 David Sciamma
> >> ? Shaun Smith
> >> ? Eike Stepper
> >> ? Martin Taal
> >> ? Thiago Tonelli Bartolomei
> >> ? Antoine Toulme
> >> +1 Markus Voelter
> >> ? Guo Tong Xie
> >> ? Yang Yang
> >> ? Pan Yue
> >> +1 gilles cannenterre
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> modeling-pmc mailing list
> >> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> emft-dev mailing list
> emft-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emft-dev
>
--
- Lucas
EMFT Search : http://www.eclipse.org/emft/projects/search/
Blog : http://my-naked-truth.blogspot.com
Ohloh : http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/8371
