Am 26.05.2010 12:49, schrieb Ed Merks:
Eike,
Keep in mind that qualifiers are compared lexicographically to induce
an order, so whatever naming scheme is used, one must ensure that the
version order progresses in an orderly manner.
Isn't that ensured by *adding* something as a postfix? Given that the
qualifiers are all of the same length except this addition.
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
Eike Stepper wrote:
Am 26.05.2010 04:25, schrieb Miles Parker:
Thanks for the clarification, Kenn. I was also wondering
about
the "2.6" part. I've seen some Eclipse projects do that and some not.
As a consumer, I prefer without, because I don't have to figure out
what version is the most current -- presumably (though I know there are
exceptions) if I want a milestone I'm only interested in a milestone
for the latest version.
I've always wondered why the feature qualifiers don't contain milestone
names. If I want to install particular milestones it's a hazzle to find
out from what date they originate. Do you think it would make sense to
add the milestone/RC name to the qualifier if the build type is "S"?
The same would be an option for "M" and "R" builds.
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
On May 25, 2010, at 7:15 PM, Kenn Hussey wrote:
That is the (old) container project
update
site which is no longer being used, at least not by EMF Core. The new
convention is to have an update site per (operating) project and,
ideally, one aggregate site for all Modeling projects. I'm actually
just in the process of setting up and testing a unified aggregate and
will be sending an email about it shortly.
Cheers,
Kenn
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Miles
Parker <milesparker@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Kenn,
I'm curious why you aren't using:
That's where I looked initially..
cheers,
Miles
On May 23, 2010, at 6:53 AM, Kenn Hussey wrote:
The RC2 build can be installed from
http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/emf/updates/2.6milestones.
RC1 can be installed from that site as well, but only if you don't
already have EMF installed (long story).
Cheers,
Kenn
On 5/23/10, Tom Schindl < tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi Kenn,
So which one is the right version
and
update site url? I tried looked at
all URLs provided on the
EMF-Website
but none of them seem to provide a
recent build to check if it can be
installed into Eclipse 4.0 SDK.
Tom
Am 23.05.10 00:42, schrieb Miles
Parker:
Thanks Kenn.. my simple searching
must have missed the report.
On May 22, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Kenn
Hussey wrote:
This is a known issue and is
fixed
in RC2 (which is already available
on the EMF site and will be
aggregated into Helios starting on
Monday).
Kenn
On 5/22/10, Miles Parker <milesparker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is anyone else having trouble
installing EMF SDK for RC1. I don't want
to
file a bug 'cause I figure if
it
were a general issue someone would have
reported it by now, but on
the
other hand I've had it happen on both of
my
machines. This is from a
brand
new 3.6 RC1, going straight to Helios
site
and attempting to install. I
get:
Cannot complete the install
because of a conflicting dependency.
Software being installed:
EMF
-
Eclipse Modeling Framework SDK
2.6.0.v20100517-1331
(org.eclipse.emf.sdk.feature.group
2.6.0.v20100517-1331)
Only one of the following
can
be
installed at once:
EMF Mapping
2.5.0.v20100427-1455 (org.eclipse.emf.mapping
2.5.0.v20100427-1455)
EMF Mapping
2.6.0.v20100511-1645 (org.eclipse.emf.mapping
2.6.0.v20100511-1645)
Cannot satisfy dependency:
From: EMF Mapping UI
2.6.0.v20100427-1455 (org.eclipse.emf.mapping.ui
2.6.0.v20100427-1455)
To: bundle
org.eclipse.emf.mapping [2.5.0,2.6.0)
Cannot satisfy dependency:
From: EMF - Eclipse
Modeling
Framework SDK 2.6.0.v20100517-1331
(org.eclipse.emf.sdk.feature.group
2.6.0.v20100517-1331)
To:
org.eclipse.emf.mapping
[2.6.0,2.7.0)
Cannot satisfy dependency:
From: EMF - Eclipse
Modeling
Framework SDK 2.6.0.v20100517-1331
(org.eclipse.emf.sdk.feature.group
2.6.0.v20100517-1331)
To:
org.eclipse.emf.mapping.ui
[2.6.0,2.7.0)
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
--
Sent from my mobile device
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
--
B e s t S o l u t i o n . a t
EDV Systemhaus GmbH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
tom schindl
geschaeftsfuehrer/CEO
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eduard-bodem-gasse 5/1 A-6020
innsbruck phone ++43 512 935834
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
--
Sent from my mobile device
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
|
