Dave Steinberg schrieb:
Hi Eike,
Thanks for the response. Yup, you *would* be covered if we were using
the automated IP log. But, since it only works for the whole project
You mean the whole modeling top-level?
or not at all, and since several components want to do static
logs, you're stuck with the old-school approach.
Lucky me: I only have these two entries ;-)
So, if you don't mind dropping your two contributions into your own IP
log (in the same format as the exiting
common log) and submitting it, it would be much appreciated. Note
that you do have an entry in section 3 already for net4j, which should
be included in yours.
Sue, I'll take care of it.
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
Cheers,
Dave
--
Dave Steinberg
Rational Software - IBM Toronto Lab
mailto:davidms@xxxxxxxxxx
 Eike Stepper
---06/02/2009 02:44:59 AM---Dave Steinberg schrieb: Hi again,
Dave Steinberg schrieb:
Hi again,
I'm still waiting for word from Net4j/CDO. Our options are only a
single log for the whole project or one log from each component. If I
don't hear anything more, I guess we'll just go with the latter option.
Sorry, I did not realize that my feedback was needed
;-(
We have only two _very_ small contributions that do not come from
committers: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&classification=Modeling&product=EMF&component=CDO&component=Net4j&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_w
hiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=iplog%2B
The iplog+ flag is set properly for these so I thought I was safe. I'm
fine with whatever the rest of us decides since this way or that wayit
won't cause me much effort ;-)
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
Cheers,
Dave
--
Dave Steinberg
Rational Software - IBM Toronto Lab
mailto:davidms@xxxxxxxxxx
Dave
Steinberg---05/29/2009 11:35:42 AM---Hi all,
From: |
Dave Steinberg/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA |
To: |
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: |
05/29/2009 11:35 AM |
Subject: |
[emf-dev] EMF IP Logs |
Hi all,
I've exchanged email with a number of people individually about IP
Logs, but I just wanted to touch base with the the whole list.
The automated IP Log for all of EMF is here: http://www.eclipse.org/projects/ip_log.php?projectid=modeling.emf
To the best of my understanding, it seems that it still doesn't support
doing components separately, so one person would need to submit the
results for the whole project. I think that's a problem for us. I also
know that, for Core at least, it would take considerable Bugzilla
tweaking to get a more or less correct result. I know that at least
Core, Query, Transaction, Validation, and Teneo have done old-school
static logs manually already. So, I think we should just stick with
that approach for this release.
I've updated the log for Core in CVS
(modeling/emf/emf/eclipse-project-ip-log.csv). I've also folded all
those changes into the main log for EMF
(modeling/emf/eclipse-project-ip-log.csv). I can see that Query,
Transaction, and Validation are up to date in that combined log, too.
I'm happy either to submit our logs independently from our components,
or to submit a single log once everyone has included their
contributions. Could people please voice their preferences?
Cheers,
Dave
--
Dave Steinberg
Rational Software - IBM Toronto Lab
mailto:davidms@xxxxxxxxxx_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
|
