Re: [emf-dev] EMF IP Logs

[Dave Steinberg <davidms@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Anthony,

I'm good with that approach. So that means everyone is on their own to get their log submitted.

Cheers,
Dave

--
Dave Steinberg
Rational Software - IBM Toronto Lab
mailto:davidms@xxxxxxxxxx


Anthony Hunter---06/01/2009 05:19:41 PM---Hi Team,

From:	Anthony Hunter/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
To:	Eclipse Modelling Framework <emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	06/01/2009 05:19 PM
Subject:	Re: [emf-dev] EMF IP Logs

---

Hi Team,

James says that the EMO would not accept one big IP log for MDT, so he submitted a separate one for MDT UML2.

I do not have one for Query, Transaction, and Validation, I just have the combined log. So I will create separate logs. 

Guess that answers your question Dave :-)

Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GEF / GMF / Modeling Tools 
Phone: 613-270-4613

Dave Steinberg---06/01/2009 03:15:06 PM---Hi again, I'm still waiting for word from Net4j/CDO. Our options are only a single

From:	Dave Steinberg/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
To:	Eclipse Modelling Framework <emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	06/01/2009 03:15 PM
Subject:	Re: [emf-dev] EMF IP Logs

---

Hi again,

I'm still waiting for word from Net4j/CDO. Our options are only a single log for the whole project or one log from each component. If I don't hear anything more, I guess we'll just go with the latter option.

Cheers,
Dave

-- 
Dave Steinberg
Rational Software - IBM Toronto Lab
mailto:davidms@xxxxxxxxxx

Dave Steinberg---05/29/2009 11:35:42 AM---Hi all,

From:	Dave Steinberg/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
To:	emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	05/29/2009 11:35 AM
Subject:	[emf-dev] EMF IP Logs

---

Hi all,

I've exchanged email with a number of people individually about IP Logs, but I just wanted to touch base with the the whole list.

The automated IP Log for all of EMF is here: http://www.eclipse.org/projects/ip_log.php?projectid=modeling.emf

To the best of my understanding, it seems that it still doesn't support doing components separately, so one person would need to submit the results for the whole project. I think that's a problem for us. I also know that, for Core at least, it would take considerable Bugzilla tweaking to get a more or less correct result. I know that at least Core, Query, Transaction, Validation, and Teneo have done old-school static logs manually already. So, I think we should just stick with that approach for this release.

I've updated the log for Core in CVS (modeling/emf/emf/eclipse-project-ip-log.csv). I've also folded all those changes into the main log for EMF (modeling/emf/eclipse-project-ip-log.csv). I can see that Query, Transaction, and Validation are up to date in that combined log, too.

I'm happy either to submit our logs independently from our components, or to submit a single log once everyone has included their contributions. Could people please voice their preferences?

Cheers,
Dave

-- 
Dave Steinberg
Rational Software - IBM Toronto Lab
mailto:davidms@xxxxxxxxxx_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev

_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev

_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev