| Hi Ed/Christian,
 Just to end this thread, we are not terminating SDO or EMF Query and both will be in Galileo. Right?
 
 Cheers...
 Anthony
 --
 Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
 Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
 IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GEF / GMF / Modeling Tools
 Phone: 613-270-4613
 
 
 
 ![Inactive hide details for Ed Merks ---09/17/2008 02:25:14 AM---Christian, Like SDO, I see Query as having little real value to]() Ed Merks ---09/17/2008 02:25:14 AM---Christian, Like SDO, I see Query as having little real value to justify its 
 
 
| ![]() From:
 | ![]() Ed Merks <ed.merks@xxxxxxxxx>
 |  | ![]() To:
 | ![]() Eclipse Modelling Framework <emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 |  | ![]() Date:
 | ![]() 09/17/2008 02:25 AM
 |  | ![]() Subject:
 | ![]() Re: [emf-dev] Status of the EMF Query Component
 |  
 
 
 Christian,
 
 Like SDO, I see Query as having little real value to justify its existence.  So like Query, I'm considering terminating the SDO component.  Components that don't have a significant established user base and for which there is no interesting future don't really don't have a place at Eclipse.  If there is really only one user, they can of course maintain the source themselves.
 
 
 
 Christian W. Damus wrote:
 
Anthony, 
 I forgot to answer your other questions.  I don't know about GMF, but Transaction build only requires the Query for the 3-in-1 feature that it publishes to the Ganymede/Galileo builds.  The Transaction and Validation components have no dependencies, and can build without it.
 
 cW
 
 
 On 16-Sep-08, at 1:47 PM, Anthony Hunter wrote:
 
 
Hi Christian,
 We are getting more information for you, but IBM makes use of EMF Query in its products. So it cannot go away for Galileo. We would be fine with creating a 1.3 version that has no new content, but just confirms from a build and smoke test perspective that it still works and is at the high standard of quality as the other components in Galileo.
 
 I am wondering why EMF Transaction and GMF have a build dependency on EMF Query for the last three years ? (I.e. EMF Query is listed on the dependencies on the download page).
 
 Cheers...
 Anthony
 --
 Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
 Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
 IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GEF / GMF / Modeling Tools
 Phone: 613-270-4613
 
 
 <graycol.gif>"Christian W. Damus" ---09/16/2008 12:14:49 PM---Hi, all, The EMF project has had, since Callisto days, a Query component
 
 
| <ecblank.gif> From:
 | <ecblank.gif> "Christian W. Damus" <cdamus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 |  | <ecblank.gif> To:
 | <ecblank.gif> emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
 |  | <ecblank.gif> Date:
 | <ecblank.gif> 09/16/2008 12:14 PM
 |  | <ecblank.gif> Subject:
 | <ecblank.gif> [emf-dev] Status of the EMF Query Component
 |  
 
 
 Hi, all,
 
 The EMF project has had, since Callisto days, a Query component providing a Java API with an SQL-ish feel for structured searches in EObject data. Since its 1.0 release, this component has not added any new features except for keeping up with its dependencies: following EMF Core in adopting J2SE 5.0, and adopting new OCL APIs.
 
 It seems to me that this component never did show much "traction" from the user community and I have no plan to initiate any new work for the Galileo release. A summary of Bugzilla activity looks like this:
 
Raised/resolved since the Ganymede (1.2) release: 0 / 0 
Raised/resolved since the Europa (1.1) release: 9 / 9 
Raised/resolved since the Callisto (1.0) release: 11 / 12 
Raised/resolved since the initial commit: 11 / 10 Note that a significant number of these bugs were releng-type bugs tagged against the Query component but applying to common/replicated artifacts and processes across the EMF Query/Transaction/Validation components and also MDT OCL.
 
 So, my questions to the community are:
 
Do you use the EMF Query component? 
Are you interested in continuing to develop the EMF Query component? 
I am happy to help contributors to earn committer rights by working with them on their patches. Your feed-back is very important to determining whether this component will have a 1.3 release in Galileo, whether it should just produce a maintenance release for Galileo, or whether it should proceed to a Termination Review.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Christian
 
 --
 Christian W. Damus
 Senior Software Developer, Zeligsoft Inc.
 Component Lead, Eclipse MDT OCL and EMF-QTV
 E-mail: cdamus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
 
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 emf-dev mailing list
 emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 emf-dev mailing list
 emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
 --
 Christian W. Damus
 Senior Software Developer, Zeligsoft Inc.
 Component Lead, Eclipse MDT OCL and EMF-QTV
 E-mail: cdamus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 emf-dev mailing list
 emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
 _______________________________________________
 emf-dev mailing list
 emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
 
 
 
 |