| Re: [elk-dev] Request for Approval to use GitHub Issues |
Done! ;) We should talk about how to structure the thing sometime. On 20/01/16 17:08, Miro Spönemann wrote: > Let’s do it! > > Miro > >> On 19.01.2016, at 11:02, Christoph Daniel Schulze <cds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> GitHub also provides a Wiki for projects. This can be enabled by asking >> the Eclipse webmasters to do so. >> >> I think the Wiki would be a great place to edit documentation in. What's >> more, since GitHub Wikis are pretty much just glorified Git repositories >> (who would have thought), we could push the layout documentation >> generated through our planned DSL to the Wiki as well. >> >> Any thoughts? If not I would simply go ahead and ask the webmasters to >> enable the Wiki for ELK. >> >> Cheers, >> Christoph Daniel >> >> On 15/01/16 16:45, Christoph Daniel Schulze wrote: >>> Dear ELK people, >>> >>> the modeling PMC has approved our usage of GitHub and the webmaster team >>> was blazingly quick in setting everything up for us. So, from now on, >>> we'll be using GitHub issues instead of Bugzilla. >>> >>> We only had two tickets so far anyway. I already migrated one over to >>> GitHub, the other one will be closed shortly anyway so I don't think >>> we'll have to migrate it. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Christoph Daniel >>> >>> On 15/01/16 12:01, Christoph Daniel Schulze wrote: >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> the Eclipse Layout Kernel team would like to use GitHub Issues instead >>>> of Bugzilla. This decision requires approval of the Modeling PMC, which >>>> we hereby apply for. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Christoph Daniel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > elk-dev mailing list > elk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/elk-dev >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature