Re: [elk-dev] ELK Refactoring

[Miro Spönemann <miro.spoenemann@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 23.12.2015, at 16:58, Ulf Rüegg <uru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> — I would vote for changing the CheckStyle configuration to be less strict. In particular:

>     - All header lines are marked with warnings. That check should be either corrected or removed.

What do you mean by headers?

File header comments.

> — We should think about good ways for ELK users to customize the behavior of the whole infrastructure. We could use Guice dependency injection for that, which makes it a lot easier to replace default implementations by your own custom code.

We have to check if gwt supports any of this. Otherwise we would have to drop klayjs, which I think we don't want to, right?

I wouldn’t use Guice in the algorithmic parts, just in the infrastructure part (former KIML). So ELK Layered would not be affected.

Miro

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail