Re: [egit-dev] Eclipse 3.4 fork

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [egit-dev] Eclipse 3.4 fork

From: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:31:53 -0500
Delivered-to: egit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Eew69I9osbTw6+1nq6G/S0fYWJfoSDTH/4/tyDb31MA9JANrTm1bxoh+XmPhWvdhq1 5qkUnAjy4m7zQOPVNJZqEQFNpvYsKKSosk9l4cSIoa2ss9440N6EfPTZs4q2g/ydMcnw BPEAzIwBXbExCPhJ3epH3z73mR0coQMKaa0QU=
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/egit-dev>
List-help: <mailto:egit-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/egit-dev>, <mailto:egit-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/egit-dev>, <mailto:egit-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> http://ntf.gbs.com/nathan/escape.nsf/d6plinks/NTFN-8FFSD4
>
> Any reason we couldn't fix this by means of modifying the debugtrace ? Doesn't seem that it would be hard to do.

Are you sure that's it? It's a lot of work staying with older Eclipse
versions... I wouldn't be surprised if IBM Domino Designer will move
to a newer version of Eclipse soon since it's based on 3.4...

-- 
Cheers,

Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 512 961 6719

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [egit-dev] Eclipse 3.4 fork
  - From: Alex Blewitt

References:
- [egit-dev] Eclipse 3.4 fork
  - From: Alex Blewitt

Prev by Date: Re: [egit-dev] Merge Tool does not work for conflicts while cherry-picking
Next by Date: Re: [egit-dev] Eclipse 3.4 fork
Previous by thread: [egit-dev] Eclipse 3.4 fork
Next by thread: Re: [egit-dev] Eclipse 3.4 fork
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs