| RE: [egit-dev] diff across branches? |
|
If I recall it was Erich Gamma who first equated Bugzilla
reports with love letters. I think that’s a healthy attitude for Eclipse
projects, since any popular Eclipse project gets inundated with bugs. As
an example, here’s a chart of open “bugs” against
Mylyn. Naturally we’d have no hope of staying on top of them
without Mylyn, which is a weirdly self-referential state to be in, since the
moment we add a new feature that helps with bug triage, we get a dozen new bugs
on that.
Mik -- Dr. Mik Kersten CEO: http://tasktop.com Lead: http://eclipse.org/mylyn Follow: http://twitter.com/mik_kersten From: egit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:egit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer Anyway, welcome to Eclipse ;).
Here, code matters, not what bugzilla looks like. On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: On 30 Sep 2009, at 23:26, Robin
Rosenberg wrote: Bugs != feature request. The project is not mature enough
yet to That is exactly the point of 'enhancement' items. Despite
the name, bugzilla isn't always about bugs, it's about issues; and missing
features are certainly issues that can be tracked.
|
