Hi, 
    
    Please see below a list of things that we could work on, grouped
      by themes. At the end of the list I'm revealing what I think we
      should do :)
      Please let us know what you think.
    Pascal
    
    
    Gerrit features
      - Support for configurable number of vote types (e.g. the gerrit
      server for gerrit has 3 types of votes) (355)
      - Gerrit 2.13 features: assign a review to a user
      
      EGit integration
      - From the review editor, reveal the parent commit in the history
      view (346)
      - From the history view, open the review for a given change (604)
      
      In-editor review:
      - Properly position the markers (363)
    
    Compare:
      - Coloring goes off as you type (723)
      
      Workflows
      - Local rebase
      - Branch cleanups
      - Simplify small changes
      
      Comment presentation
      - Improve the general handling of comments (378)
        - In the compare editor, show the number of comments for left
      and right
        - Show comments not addressed.
      - Indicate that there are unpublished comments
      - Presentation of comments in 2.13 (654)
      
      Usability / Responsiveness
      - Some operations are still contacting the server in the UI thread
      (721, abandon, etc.)
      - Too much refresh (718)
      - Coloring goes off as you type (723)
      - Reply should quote the previous message
      - Completion in rebase (591)
    
    
    
    
    
    Pascal's selection:
      My thinking is that we should improve the existing features, and
      continue to improve the workflows building on the IDE integration.
      As such I'm proposing the following:
      - Support for configurable number of vote types (e.g. the gerrit
      server for gerrit has 3 types of votes) (355). This is not
      something that has been requested but we know it is missing and it
      may take a while to get right.
      - Coloring goes off as you type (723)
      - Properly position the markers (363)
      - Local rebase
          Because it continues to show that we know 
      - Some operations are still contacting the server in the UI thread
      (721, abandon, etc.)
      - Too much refresh
      - Presentation of comments in 2.13 (654)
      - Reply should quote the previous message
      
      I would also do an investigation on the EGit integration to
      understand how much it will require from EGit.