[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [ee4j-pmc] CONTRIBUTING Issue coming your way...
|
On 2020-05-11 3:09 a.m., Ivar Grimstad
wrote:
Hi,
The short answer to why this information is added to the
CONTRIBUTING.md rather than the ECA is for practical reasons.
Adding it to the ECA would require board approval and it
would affect projects where it is not necessarily needed.
For a longer, more precise answer, please contact the EMO.
I would add the following: The reason why we didn't want to add this
to the ECA is because this text only really applies to specification
projects hosted at GitHub, not all EF open source projects
generally. Invalidating everyone's ECA's yet again for something
which is basically a Jakarta-EE-specific issue didn't seem to make
sense on a community-wide perspective.
HTH
Markus :)
Thanks
for clarifying this. I understand the common
benefit of a CONTRIBUTING file in general, but as
always, I'd like to know the legal reason for each
"MUST" anybody imposes on a subproject. :-)
-Markus
Hi Markus,
That's a good point. I
don't know actually. I'll check with Wayne.
There is p robably a good reason for it.
I
wonder why this has to be added to the
Contributing.md file of all projects:
Shouldn't this simply be part of the ECA?
For
completeness, we also have this document
which is the approved proposal which
precipitated the non-assert amendment to
the CONTRIBUTING docs..
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VMXVzdfBflKfhW0rmTJXI2sRAdECaVTXnElZ_RSrUME/edit#heading=h.5ku0nbahp5wg(everyone should
have read access via this link...)
---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE
architect @ IBM
e-mail: sutter@xxxxxxxxxx
Twitter: @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620
(office)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter
From:
"Kevin
Sutter" <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:
EE4J
PMC Discussions <ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
05/06/2020
13:41
Subject:
[EXTERNAL]
Re: [ee4j-pmc] CONTRIBUTING Issue coming
your way...
Sent
by: ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi
Markus,
This item was initially discussed at the
Jakarta EE Steering Committee on March 24
(search for "non assert"):
https://jakarta.ee/meeting_minutes/steering_committee/minutes-march-24-2020.pdf
Once the wording was properly reviewed and
approved, then it was sent to the PMC for
their "approval" and action. I (as a
member of the PMC) volunteered to
communicate this need to the Project Leads
via Issues for easy tracking. Hope that's
sufficient. If you need more
justification, I would suggest contacting
the Eclipse EMO. Thanks!
---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE
architect @ IBM
e-mail: sutter@xxxxxxxxxx
Twitter: @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620
(office)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter
From: "Markus
KARG" <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'EE4J PMC
Discussions'" <ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 05/06/2020 12:39
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re:
[ee4j-pmc] CONTRIBUTING Issue coming your
way...
Sent by: ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
It
would be fine if the PMC could also tell
us the reason WHY all projects MUST add
that text. :-)
-Markus
Von:ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag
von Kevin Sutter
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Mai 2020
23:36
An: JakartaEE Spec Project
Leadership discussions
Cc: EE4J PMC Discussions
Betreff: [ee4j-pmc] CONTRIBUTING
Issue coming your way...
Hi,
Just a heads up that I will be creating
(on behalf of the PMC) an Issue against
each Specification Project to
update/create a CONTRIBUTING file in each
of your respective specification-related
github repos. We need this update for all
of our Specification Projects. The Issue
description will have the detail that
needs to be specified. We're asking you
to do this at your earliest convenience.
This would actually be an easy "first
issue" for anybody that is looking to get
started on a project...
Thanks!