[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [ee4j-pmc] [jakarta.ee-spec] [jakartaee-spec-project-leads] Specification Documents
|
Tom, I have the 1.3 version for you. Can you point me to the
IPzilla entry for 1.2 and hopefully I can add it to that.
Tom Jenkinson wrote on 3/10/20 4:25 AM:
Hi Wayne,
The Jakarta Transactions project had the version 1.2 of the
Oracle specification contributed via IPzilla, although a 1.3
version exists. It was discussed a bit in this thread:
A legal question; it is fine to use the version 1.2 of the
specification as the basis of the conversion but selecting
parts of the 1.3 version from
https://github.com/javaee/jta-spec
or would that pose any legal issues?
Thanks for your input,
Tom
Greetings folks.
We finally managed to clear all of the
specification documents provided to us by our good
friends at Oracle.
I have contributed all of them to their projects via
IPzilla. I've copied project leads on the CQs; project
leads should have all received notification of the
creation of the CQs via email. I've updated our
tracking board.
Committers can see the list of CQs we're using to track
the intellectual property due diligence process on these
documents
here.
Committers who want to stay informed of progress can add
themselves in CC to a record.
Project teams, please wait until the IP Team grants
you "checkin" before you grab the contents and add it
to your Git repository (the IP Team will add the
"checkin" keyword to the record; those who are in CC
will be copied on the message). Note that "checkin" is
only the first part of the IP review process; the CQs
will need to be "approved" before the release, so please
respond promptly to any questions or concerns expressed
by the IP Team.
Side note: I noticed that
Jakarta XML
Binding has no project lead. We need somebody from
that project team to step up. Project leads are the main
liaison between the project team and the EMO and first
link in the leadership chain, responsible for ensuring
that the project team is doing the right sorts of things
to be successful and just generally following the rules;
it's a role primarily of responsibility, not power.
Thank you to everyone who contributed to the
process of sorting out the intellectual property
issues around these documents.
I'll take this opportunity to remind specification
project teams that if you are planning to do more for
the Jakarta EE 9 release than is included in the
current plan, you need to craft a plan for your
project and get ballot approval from the Jakarta EE
Specification Committee. Use the
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
to communicate with the specification committee and
community as you develop your plan (please do not
develop your plan in a vacuum and expect the
specification committee to approve it).
Wayne
--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
_______________________________________________
jakartaee-spec-project-leads mailing list
jakartaee-spec-project-leads@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-spec-project-leads
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!PWkdUoKpnWFEYReAQrb34_Sj9GNZ_I7lmxwcUHpJe4FW56nIMywek7sKYLE7VM2t9g$