Not answering questions is not really helpful when trying to build up trust. Maybe we should begin to roll differently so it gets easier for me to get volunteers into the boat. ;-)
-Markus
From: ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Milinkovich
Sent: Donnerstag, 13. September 2018 16:03
To: ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ee4j-pmc] [jakarta.ee-community] EE4J PMC Meeting Minute #20
On 2018-09-12 5:21 PM, Markus KARG wrote:
Without an answer to this question, the reader of this thread could apply that the PMC members possibly decide arbitrarily at their personal will (maybe not checking anything told in the EDP at all, or possibly checking things not requested by the EDP), which I certainly do not assume to be the case.
Open source would be a lot more fun if everyone assumed good intentions.
It is not the policy of the Eclipse Foundation to document policies to document *everything*. Trust and good judgment are assumed. That's how we roll.
![Avast logo]()
| This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com |
