Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ee4j-pmc] PMC Minutes

I clearly indicated that it’s my personal (not all PMC) opinion in the previous email.
Bottom-up approach is fine. I am not sure it will work though. I will be happy if it does. 

— Dmitry

On 17 May 2018, at 21:56, David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On May 17, 2018, at 11:22 AM, Dmitry Kornilov <dmitry.kornilov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I don’t think that bottom-up effort will demonstrate great results. [...]

For the general directions, I believe that it will be more effective if PMC creates a vision document draft and initiate a public review. During the review committers can suggest changes. PMC will review changes and release a final version of the document.

Just a quick note on this as Markus is going to read that thinking this is the perspective of all the PMC.

I know particularly Steve and I believe bottom up is the right approach.  We did agree to put together a template by Tuesday so that we could give projects some minimal guidance on what information we're looking for, but they would be the ones to actually fill it in.

Certainly, some things can be top-down.  The concern is so far everything has been top-down, so we need to deliberately create some balance.


ee4j-pmc mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit

Back to the top