| My proposal was to just put all of these under a new "platform"
      project that represented the Jakarta EE platform, the replacement
      for the Java EE platform spec and expert group.  The lead for that
      platform project could easily handle these never-changing APIs.
 One of the concerns with putting each of these in its own project
      was finding project leads for each one.  So, which of you signed
      up to be the project lead for the Eclipse Project for Stable EE4J
      APIs"?
 
 Dmitry Kornilov wrote on 03/15/2018
      08:39 AM:
 
      
      Ok. It looks like that we agreed on “Eclipse Project for Stable
      EE4J APIs” name. 
      I’ll create a proposal and post it for review. 
         
 — Dmitry 
            
              
              
 
                I'm with Kevin there. The
                  components will be a part of the first version of
                  Jakarta EE, but may be removed later and live on as
                  stable EE4J projects.
                   
 Ivar
                  
                  Mike,Since the
                      top-level project is still
                      EE4J, I'd prefer "Eclipse
                      Project for Stable EE4J
                      APIs".  But, I can be overruled...
                       :-)
 
 
 ---------------------------------------------------
 Kevin Sutter
 STSM, MicroProfile and Java EE architect
 e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx
                          Twitter:  @kwsutter
 phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)
 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter
 
 
 
 From:      
                       Mike
                      Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 To:      
                       ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
 Date:      
                       03/15/2018
                      09:42 AM
 Subject:    
                         Re: [ee4j-pmc]
                      EE4J project name for legacy components
 Sent by:    
                         ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
 
 
 
 
 
 At the risk of being unhelpfully pedantic, is
                      "Eclipse Project for
                      Stable EE4J APIs" accurate? Should it be "Eclipse
                      Project for
                      Stable Jakarta EE APIs"?
 
 Feel free to ignore this if its unhelpful or just
                      plain wrong.
 
 On 2018-03-15 10:35 AM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
 +1 for something that at
                      least indicates that we're talking
                      about EE4J projects.
 
 #3 has a nice ring to it.
 
 Wayne
 
 On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at
                      10:02 AM, Mark Little <mlittle@xxxxxxxxxx>
                      wrote:
 Kevin, you're right in that
                      it's too generic as it stands.
                      I like option 3.
 
 On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Kevin Sutter <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx>
                      wrote:
 > I like the word "Stable" as well, but don't
                      we need more
                      than just "Eclipse
 > Project for Stable APIs"?  It's too generic. 
                      There
                      is nothing to indicate
 > which top-level project we are referring to. 
                      Are these stable
                      apis for the
 > Eclipse IDE, or stable apis for Eclipse
                      OpenJ9, or Eclipse EMF, or
                      what?
 >
 > So, I think we need some qualifier to
                      indicate the parent top-level
                      project.
 > Something like...
 >
 > Eclipse Project for Enterprise Stable APIs
 > Eclipse Project for Stable Enterprise APIs
 > Eclipse Project for Stable EE4J APIs
 > Eclipse Enterprise Stable APIs
 > EE4J Stable APIs
 >
 >
                      ---------------------------------------------------
 > Kevin Sutter
 > STSM, MicroProfile and Java EE architect
 > e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx 
                         Twitter:  @kwsutter
 > phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620(office)
 > LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter
 >
 >
 >
 > From:        Mark Little <mlittle@xxxxxxxxxx>
 > To:        EE4J PMC Discussions <ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 > Date:        03/15/2018 07:28 AM
 > Subject:        Re: [ee4j-pmc] EE4J project
                      name
                      for legacy components
 > Sent by:        ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
 > ________________________________
 >
 >
 >
 > +1
 >
 > On 15 Mar 2018, at 12:08, Steve Millidge
                      (Payara)
 > <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
 >
 > I personally prefer Stable as legacy is a
                      little negative.
 >
 > If they have been formally deprecated we
                      could use
 >
 > Eclipse Project for Deprecated APIs
 >
 > Steve
 >
 > From: ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx<ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
                      On Behalf
 > Of Ivar Grimstad
 > Sent: 15 March 2018 11:58
 > To: EE4J PMC Discussions <ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 > Subject: Re: [ee4j-pmc] EE4J project name for
                      legacy components
 >
 >
 > Eclipse Project for Stable APIs?
 > Eclipse Project for Sustained APIs?
 >
 > I am also good with Legacy.
 >
 > Ivar
 >
 > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:59 AM Dmitry
                      Kornilov
 > <dmitry.kornilov@xxxxxxxxxx>
                      wrote:
 > Hi,
 >
 > We agreed on the last PMC meeting that we
                      will move legacy components
                      listed
 > below to a new project. We need to decide
                      about this project name.
                      I am
 > starting this thread to discuss it.
 >
 > Components:
 >
 > Eclipse Project for Enterprise Management
 > Eclipse Project for Enterprise Deployment
 > Eclipse Project for JAX-RPC
 > Eclipse Project for WADL
 > Eclipse Project for JAXR
 >
 > I am proposing Eclipse Project for legacy
                      APIs. WDYT? Other options?
 >
 > Thanks,
 > Dmitry
 _______________________________________________
 ee4j-pmc mailing list
 ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
 To change your delivery options, retrieve your
                        password, or unsubscribe
                        from this list, visit
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dev.eclipse.org_mailman_listinfo_ee4j-2Dpmc&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=R9dtOS3afYnRUmu_zogmh0VnVYl2tse_V7QBUA9yr_4&m=l1KMVA1DZRuDXbqp6WcGgV4T5Rfq95kCXkp5_9PbPJ4&s=7RbULwSxrKMjmzUd-lmKYYCM17aiDRYcgRENzFNYH_c&e=
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 ee4j-pmc mailing list
 ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
 To change your delivery options, retrieve your
                    password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc
 
 
                -- 
                 
                  
                    Java Champion, JCP EC/EG
                      Member, EE4J PMC, JUG Leader 
                _______________________________________________ 
                ee4j-pmc mailing list
                ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx 
                To change your delivery options, retrieve your password,
                or unsubscribe from this list, visit
                https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc
 
 _______________________________________________
ee4j-pmc mailing list
ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc
 
 |