Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ee4j-pmc] Short names and URLs

Sorry for my confusion. Got my wires crossed.

Sent from IBM Verse

Bill Shannon --- Re: [ee4j-pmc] Short names and URLs ---

From:"Bill Shannon" <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:"EE4J PMC Discussions" <ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mike Milinkovich" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:Thu, 14 Dec 2017 19:14
Subject:Re: [ee4j-pmc] Short names and URLs

I agree.  We settled on the flat project structure, but this issue is about the URLs being used to access the project resources.

Mike Milinkovich wrote on 12/14/2017 05:17 AM:

Are you two discussing the same thing? This thread started talking about the structure of URLs, but seems to have veered into discussing project structures. There is at least the possibility that you're miscommunicating.

On 2017-12-14 12:13 AM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
A hierarchical structure is more work for the project team. By introducing an extra level of hierarchy, you are introducing extra projects which require additional management. Just setting them up requires that you come up with names. What resources are allocated to the organizational nodes? Do those extra nodes in the hierarchy have their own websites? Who has what roles on those organizational nodes?

Frankly, it's not all that much more work for me.

What, specifically, are we doing to work around a "flat" structure?

If there is some demonstrable value in having a hierarchy withi-Your data has been truncated. Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

Back to the top