Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ee4j-pmc] Short names and URLs

Wayne, a hierarchical structure might be more work for Eclipse but every time we discuss this we seem to end up trying to work around the flat structure. I don't want to slow us down by reopening this but I would not be surprised if a year along we found ourselves needing to do that. There's a level of collective scale here that a project hierarchy may have a benefit that eclipse has not observed before

Sent from IBM Verse

Bill Shannon --- Re: [ee4j-pmc] Short names and URLs ---

From:"Bill Shannon" <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:"Wayne Beaton" <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:"EE4J PMC Discussions" <ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:Wed, 13 Dec 2017 22:53
Subject:Re: [ee4j-pmc] Short names and URLs

If the web sites for all the EE4J projects were under, that would at least make the naming consistent.  Ditto  Is there some reason not to do that?

Wayne Beaton wrote on 12/13/17 02:33 PM:
The project space is absolutely a hierarchy. e.g. look at the "Related Links" on the right of

I tend to argue against making a hierarchy any deeper than <root>/<tlp>/<project> because making it deeper adds work that doesn't add value.

We can make the w-Your data has been truncated. Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

Back to the top