Re: [ee4j-community] [eclipse.org-membership-at-large] Proposed EE.next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [ee4j-community] [eclipse.org-membership-at-large] Proposed EE.next Working Group

From: "Heiko Rupp" <hrupp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 09:13:57 +0100
Delivered-to: ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ee4j-community>
List-help: <mailto:ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community>, <mailto:ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/ee4j-community>, <mailto:ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 5 Feb 2018, at 20:51, Mike Milinkovich wrote:

A proposal has been made to establish the EE.next Working Group

The FAQ says "Strategic members are the vendors that deliver Java EEimplementations".


Can you please clarify the role of *projects* like TomEE or Hammock

that may also deliver an ee4j implementation. Are they included in theterm

"vendor" above?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ee4j-community] [eclipse.org-membership-at-large] Proposed EE.next Working Group
  - From: Mike Milinkovich

Prev by Date: Re: [ee4j-community] Status of Brand Selection
Next by Date: Re: [ee4j-community] [eclipse.org-membership-at-large] Proposed EE.next Working Group
Previous by thread: [ee4j-community] Status of Brand Selection
Next by thread: Re: [ee4j-community] [eclipse.org-membership-at-large] Proposed EE.next Working Group
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top