[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ee4j-community] Feedback to Joint Community Open Letter on Java EE Naming and Packaging
- From: "Heiko Rupp" <hrupp@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:20:17 +0100
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
thank you for your comprehensive write-up.
On 16 Jan 2018, at 16:04, will.lyons@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
â We are intending to allow certain uses of existing javax
packages as those packages evolve for compatibility.
I understand that Oracle wants to preserve the Java brand.
As the package javax.enterprise already exists, couldn't
this be treated as a case of #2 like javax.servlet, where
I understand that Servlet 2018 spec could introduce a
On the other hand, I personally would not mind using
ee4j as new top-level package and not stuff it into
javax.enterprise.*, as those would be new imports into
Reg. Adresse: Red Hat GmbH, Technopark II, Haus C,
Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 14, D-85630 Grasbrunn
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht MÃnchen HRB 153243
GeschÃftsfÃhrer: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill,