Re: [ee4j-community] Just for application servers?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [ee4j-community] Just for application servers?

From: Dimitris Andreadis <dandread@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 18:09:21 +0200
Delivered-to: ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ee4j-community>
List-help: <mailto:ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community>, <mailto:ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/ee4j-community>, <mailto:ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0

On 14/10/2017 18:48, Edward Burns wrote:

On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 01:38:16 +0200, Dimitris Andreadis <dandread@xxxxxxxxxx> said:

DA> Maybe it should be rephrased from "application servers" to "runtime
DA> environments that provide Enterprise Java API implementations", or
DA> something of that sort.

How about "Runtime for enterprise JVM workloads"?

That's fine.

/Dimitris

Ed

References:
- [ee4j-community] Just for application servers?
  - From: Jean-Francois James
- Re: [ee4j-community] Just for application servers?
  - From: Martijn Verburg
- Re: [ee4j-community] Just for application servers?
  - From: Mike Milinkovich
- Re: [ee4j-community] Just for application servers?
  - From: Dimitris Andreadis
- Re: [ee4j-community] Just for application servers?
  - From: Edward Burns

Prev by Date: Re: [ee4j-community] Deprecating EJB in Favor of CDI Services
Next by Date: Re: [ee4j-community] Deprecating EJB in Favor of CDI Services
Previous by thread: Re: [ee4j-community] Just for application servers?
Next by thread: Re: [ee4j-community] Just for application servers?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs