Re: [ee4j-community] Just for application servers?

[Mark Little <mlittle@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes it will be.

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:31 AM, Martijn Verburg
<martijnverburg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> A number of people have raised similar concerns so thank you! I strongly
> suspect the project charter will be amended accordingly
>
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 at 14:29, Jean-Francois James <jefrajames@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> First off, I want to thank all of you who've started working on EE4J. What
>> an exciting and huge challenge!
>>
>>
>>
>> Reading the draft charter, I've the feeling that speaking about "APIs for
>> application servers" is a bit restrictive. The present is focused on
>> microservices and containers, serverless may be the future and in this
>> context "Application servers" in general do not look that future-proof.
>>
>>
>>
>> By saying that, I don't want to re-start the technical debate "Thin war vs
>> Uber jar". It is just a matter of communication and intention. May be we
>> should speak about "standard APIs for modern Java applications".
>>
>>
>>
>> A good illustration of what I mean here is RedHat Wildfly Swarm wich
>> enables to run the same applications in a server or standalone mode.
>>
>>
>>
>> Jean-François James
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ee4j-community mailing list
>> ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>> from this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community
>
> --
> Cheers, Martijn (Sent from Gmail Mobile)
>
> _______________________________________________
> ee4j-community mailing list
> ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
> this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community
>