Re: [ee4j-community] EE4J as a TLP/Clarification of proposed hierarchy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [ee4j-community] EE4J as a TLP/Clarification of proposed hierarchy

From: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 20:28:04 -0400
Delivered-to: ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ee4j-community>
List-help: <mailto:ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community>, <mailto:ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/ee4j-community>, <mailto:ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0

On 2017-10-01 8:25 PM, John D. Ament wrote:

I'm not too clear on Eclipse project structure. Does the proposal text indicate that EE4J would be a project in parallel to the "technology" project? Or in parallel to the "MicroProfile" project?

It would be a peer of Technology.

--
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(m) +1.613.220.3223

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ee4j-community] EE4J as a TLP/Clarification of proposed hierarchy
  - From: John D. Ament

References:
- [ee4j-community] EE4J as a TLP/Clarification of proposed hierarchy
  - From: John D. Ament

Prev by Date: [ee4j-community] EE4J as a TLP/Clarification of proposed hierarchy
Next by Date: [ee4j-community] Licensing Question
Previous by thread: [ee4j-community] EE4J as a TLP/Clarification of proposed hierarchy
Next by thread: Re: [ee4j-community] EE4J as a TLP/Clarification of proposed hierarchy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs