| OK, this is some property in pom.xml but what about OSGI headers: * Implementation-Vendor-Id: Shall all those 3 vendos be set to ${vendor.name}?
    I'm not sure especially with "Specification-Vendor".* Specification-Vendor:
 * Bundle-Vendor:
 * Implementation-Vendor:
 
 What about Implementation-Vendor-Id? Is "jakarta" or "jakarta.ee4j"
    a good choice?
 
 Tomas
 
 
 Dne 31/10/18 v 16:56 Jim Krueger
      napsal(a):
 
      
      
        Ok,  So to be clear:  For all 4 Stable EE4J projects
          (management-api, enterprise-deployment, jax-rpc-api, and
          jaxr-api) will will change 
 
 
          <vendor.name>Oracle
          Corporation</vendor.name>  
 to 
 
          <vendor.name>Eclipse
          Project for Stable EE4J APIs</vendor.name>  
 and remove the following: 
 
          
          
            
              
                | <name>Oracle
                  Corporation</name> |  
               
          </organization >
         
 
        
        
          
            _______________________________________________I agree with Wayne. 
 
            Also, EE4J parent pom contains organization section. It’s
            set to Eclipse Foundation.
             
 If you use the parent pom you can omit the organization
              section and organization will be derived from the parent
              pom. 
 — Dmitry 
 ee4j-build mailing list
 ee4j-build@xxxxxxxxxxx
 To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
          unsubscribe from this list, visit
 https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-build
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
ee4j-build mailing list
ee4j-build@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-build
 
 |