[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [eclipselink-users] eclipselink failed tests
- From: Tom Ware <tom.ware@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 09:43:14 -0500
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- User-agent: Thunderbird 184.108.40.206 (Windows/20100228)
Here is a bug that covers the 2 errors:
Please vote for the bug if it is actually causing problems for you.
The SQLLite issues are likely because we have not done certification on
SQLLite and there are some areas where its behavior deviates from our default
database platform support.
As for the benchmark performance results, this benchmark is entirely
developed, controlled and run by ObjectDB and the results are, as such,
subjective. A more accurate picture of the performance of various providers can
be obtained by peer/competitor reviewed benchmarks. (e.g. SpecJ benchmark) To
prove its performance, ObjectDB should consider publishing results from such a
Yannick Majoros wrote:
On this page: http://www.jpab.org/All/All/All.html, I noticed they claim
Eclipselink fails 2 tests for most databases (up to 35 for some databases).
I'm just wondering: is this true, or are the tests wrong? Also, what do
you think about ObjectDB's performance claims?
eclipselink-users mailing list