Correct, you are not to specify the mappedBy value
in this case then.
Thanks for entering the bug. Till a fix is
submitted, a work around would be to remove the mapping from the embeddable and
specify it on the owning entity.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 10:23
Subject: Re: [eclipselink-users]
Eclipselink 1.1,one-to-many inside an embeddable
and thanks for your answer!
This looks like a bug, please enter
yes, exactly: I want a unidirectional
one-to-many and I'm explicitley specifying the join table.
In the mean time, are you purposely
leaving the mappedBy value off the OneToMany? Meaning, is a uni-directional
one to many using a join table what you are expecting/want in this
as such, I
interpreted the dox that I wouldn't need to specify the mappedBy for the