|
Werner,
Correct, you are not to specify the mappedBy value
in this case then.
Thanks for entering the bug. Till a fix is
submitted, a work around would be to remove the mapping from the embeddable and
specify it on the owning entity.
Cheers,
Guy
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 10:23
AM
Subject: Re: [eclipselink-users]
Eclipselink 1.1,one-to-many inside an embeddable
Hello Guy
and thanks for your answer!
Guy
Pelletier schrieb:
Hi Warner,
This looks like a bug, please enter
one. done
In the mean time, are you purposely
leaving the mappedBy value off the OneToMany? Meaning, is a uni-directional
one to many using a join table what you are expecting/want in this
case?
yes, exactly: I want a unidirectional
one-to-many and I'm explicitley specifying the join table.
as such, I
interpreted the dox that I wouldn't need to specify the mappedBy for the
reverse link
Cheers,
Guy
thanks and
cheers,
Werner
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users
mailing
list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
|
