Hello Mitesh,
The package will have to be discussed with the expert group.
Currently the licensing of the specification does not allow for the
extension of the javax.persistence namespace so we will probably have
an eclipselink package within the persistence jar.
The stubbed behaviour is fine for now except isLoaded() should
return false for the UKNOWN case. ( I understand you need it to return
true to test validation for now)
The PersistenceUtil class is under discussion but will not likely
change drastically.
--Gordon
Mitesh Meswani wrote:
Hi Tom,
Gordon,
Can you please review attached changes.
- Introduce PersitenceUtilImpl.java. This implements
PersitenceUtilImpl as described in the spec.
The attached file is under javax.persistence package. We might need to
move this if comptibility folks suggest otherwise
Doug, can you please specially review the header for this file to make
sure that no lawyers are offended.
- Modify Persitence.getPersitenceUtil() to return above
PersistenceUtilImpl
- Modify org.eclipse.persitence.jpa.PersistenceProvider to return
LoadState.UNKNOWN for isLoaded*().
This would flag all objects and attributes as not recognizable by
EclipseLink hence would trigger PersitenceUtil.isLoaded*() to return
true
This would of course need to be replaced with correct implementation.
I plan to implement it in coming week and will trouble you guys with
questions about EclipseLink weaving for that :).
I understand that there is still some debate going on within the expert
group about PersistenceUtil and it might need to be refactored.
However, I am trying to integrate EclipseLink 2.0.0-M4 into GlassFish
V3 and
running into issues with GlassFish / Bean Validation integration. V3
uses Bean
Validation to validate its configuration information. Bean Validation
code fails with EclipseLink M4 as Persitence.getPersitenceUtil()
returns javax.persitence.spi.PersitenceUtil instead of
javax.persistence.PersitenceUtil. (I still need to figure out why
GlassFish was not breaking with 2.0.0-M3 where
Persitence.getPersistenceUtil was an instance method instead of a
static method. But, I guess it is more productive to concentrate on how
to move forward from current state). I had already fixed the return
value in EclipseLink trunk, but that is not sufficient as we do not
have Persistence.getPersitenceUtil() implemented.
Tom,
Provided I am able to check these changes in, can we get a promoted
build of EclipseLink with these changes.
Thanks,
Mitesh
|
