Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipselink-dev] Re: Fix for bug 275042

What does "not strictly required" mean?  Is this bug present in EclipseLink?  What were the user visible symptoms of the original bug?
--Gordon

David Minsky wrote:
Rollback of fix for: 275042 due to performance regression in bug 277148.

Removed fix to ParameterExpression for unwrapping and validation of wrapped parameter types in the case where there is no base _expression_ present. This fix was originally done to synchronize code bases, and is not strictly required in EclipseLink.

David Minsky wrote:
A fix for bug 275042 has been checked in, and was previously reviewed.
(Synchronizing codebases)

http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?275042

Description: Fix to ParameterExpression to enable unwrapping and validation of wrapped parameter types in the case where there is no base _expression_ present.

Reviewed: Guy Pelletier
Revision: 4120

-David

--
Oracle Email Signature Logo
David Minsky | Senior Member of Technical Staff | (613) 288-4605
Oracle Server Technologies | Sustaining Engineering
45 O'Connor Street, Suite 400, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1P 1A4

_______________________________________________ eclipselink-dev mailing list eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-dev

Back to the top