| Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] Talks selection process |
> Le 26 oct. 2015 à 15:10, Maximilian Koegel <mkoegel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > I understand both your positions but I am in favor of treating this as a test balloon, therefore I think we should limit the publicly announced influence of the community voting, since we will not be able to take it back easily. Yes, that's my point ;) > Another question about this came into my mind: If we opted for x% influence by community voting, do we define a lower bound in the number of votes overall in community voting before we even consider it in the voting result? I think we should define this lower bound, however setting it is very difficult! Maybe we can define this minimum number of votes as a function of the number of submissions (and let's define 1 vote = 1 grade for 1 talk by 1 user): lower bound = X * number of submissions. Any proposal for X? 2, 5, 10, 100? (these maths should be simple enough so I won't screw it ;))
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail