Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] product transparency ?

[Martin Lippert <mlippert@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hey Max,

I agree with Ian, please ask the submitter to be as transparent as possible.

In addition to that I don’t think that being not closely related with Eclipse is a killer argument against a talk. I assume that we will have some non-Eclipse talks at the conference (for example, pure Java-related talks not mentioning Eclipse) and if it is a great and interesting topic, I would be perfectly fine with this. In the end, we should find a good balance.

Cheers,
-Martin





> 
> Hey,
> 
> Just a question about what level of transparency we want/suggests in the abstracts.
> 
> In https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2015/session/java-development-cloud Greg S. from Oracle has an abstract
> that sounds like he is talking about general Java development but I sense major part of it is and will
> be about Oracle Developer Cloud Service.
> 
> That is all fine, but should we in these situation ask them to update their abstract to at least mention this ?
> 
> (note: for this specific instance I feel we got much less room for talks than usual so I'm a 0-1 star for this specific talk
> since it does not have much eclipse.org relevance IMO, but just wondering in general what our stance are on this?)
> 
> 
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
> _______________________________________________
> eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
> eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee