Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] 81 Talks Selected 
The "on-the-fence" selection was not too inspiring to me. I only picked
the following ones:
-
https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/hitchiker-guide-eclipse-presentation-frameworks-galaxy
	because having a comparison of the different UI frameworks is interesting
- https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/wiring-internet-things-node-red
	because it shows Orion and m2m and is cool
https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/advanced-tests-tycho
	because testing is an important topic (3 talks were submitted) and we
need to at least have one talk on it

For the others I would like:
-
https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/rapid-reactive-webapp-development-play-eclipse
  	because Play is a cool web app framework, also because this could be of
interest to ppl interested in vert.x
-
https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/changing-way-you-think-about-concurrency
 	because akka it is definitely a nice way to deal with concurrency and
the talk will do demos in Java (not Scala)
-
https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/complex-bpm-solution-developed-and-deployed-30-minutes
	because having an overview of Stardust is good
-
https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/developing-multi-component-environment-while-keeping-your-sanity
	because it brings an end-to-end perspective on lifecycle tools, and also
because JFrog is a renouned company in the Java community (won product
award at JavaOne this year) and they made an effort to submit 4 talks
(https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/user/2048) and I believe it is a new
speaker to Econ.
-
https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/developing-and-running-large-enterprise-application-based-eclipse-gyrex-experience-report
	because it is the most general talk of the Gyrex ones and is an
experience report

I skipped the Scala talk because I think that getting Scala in 35 min is
not that easy.
I dismissed the Scout talk because I did not find it general enough.
I'm mixed on the Paypal talk and they could also submit it to the CDT summit.

We don't have Angular.js content (at least not that I have seen). Should
we reach to their community?





On Sat, November 23, 2013 00:48, Ian Bull wrote:
> Please send me both your suggestions for other talks to consider (talks
> on-the-fence) and 'accepted' talks that we should consider bumping. You
> can
> either send them to the list, or just to me personally. I will summarize
> what people send me before the next meeting.
>
> Ideally we will have 90-95 talks tentatively marked as accepted before the
> next meeting, and the meeting will just be a matter of filling in the
> final
> pieces.
>
> Don't worry about the tracks right now. Obviously we can't add 17 more
> talks to a single track, but the number of talks-per-track is a guideline.
> I just want to be close.
>
> Anne added the CDT talk [1]. I'm listed as the speaker, but obviously
> that's not true. *David*, can you give us a bio on the speaker? Please
> cast
> your votes if you have a chance.
>
> [1]
> https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/edit-compile-debug-45-million-lines-unix-c-codes-any-box-using-eclipse
>
> Cheers,
> Ian
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Pascal Rapicault
> <pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> Do we keep our findings until next meeting or do we start sharing here?
>> Also for the 17 talks left, should we worry about specific tracks
>> (hopefully not :)).
>>
>> > I've met with a few small groups, and accepted a few more talks
>> (>=3.7)
>> in
>> > RCP and Java. This comes to 80 selected talks [1]. I've also heard
>> back
>> > from Docker, and they are going to present. Finally, I marked 17
>> > 'on-the-fence' talks that I think are close, and we should consider
>> [2].
>> >
>> > 80 + 1 + 17 == 98 (our magic number).
>> >
>> > Unfortunately it's not that easy :(. I've received the CDT talk from
>> > PayPall (I'll send out the abstract). Also, there are a few projects
>> that
>> > are not represented.
>> >
>> >    - Birt (We have a tutorial though)
>> >    - Jubula (Alex is giving another talk, and we have a tutorial)
>> >    - CBI (We have a talk on HIPP, but not CBI itself)
>> >    - Scout
>> >    - Gyrex
>> >    - Scala
>> >
>> > So, here is what I need you to do:
>> >
>> >
>> >    1. Go through the 'accept' [1] talks and see if there are any you
>> >    completely disagree with. I imagine 'JDT Tips and Tricks' might be
>> a
>> > bit
>> >    controversial, however it is being given by a pretty talented
>> female
>> >    committer on the JDT. I think giving the chance for some core JDT
>> >    committers to present about advanced tips and tricks in the JDT is
>> "a
>> > good
>> >    thing".
>> >
>> >    2. Go through the other talks and let me know if anything else
>> should
>> > be
>> >    considered (anything not marked as 'on-the-fence'). This can
>> include
>> >    projects that are listed above (for example, which scala talk
>> should
>> be
>> >    on-the-fence). I don't think we need one from each project, but
>> let's
>> > make
>> >    sure we consider this.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Ian
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/eclipsecon-admin/sessions/unprocessed?keys=&field_session_track_tid%5B%5D=10&field_session_track_tid%5B%5D=4&field_session_track_tid%5B%5D=5&field_session_track_tid%5B%5D=48&field_session_track_tid%5B%5D=9&field_session_track_tid%5B%5D=6&field_session_track_tid%5B%5D=7&field_session_track_tid%5B%5D=12&field_session_type_tid=19&field_accepted_value_1%5B%5D=0&field_accepted_value_1%5B%5D=1&field_accepted_value_1%5B%5D=2&field_session_pc_tags_tid%5B%5D=476
>> >
>> > [2]
>> >
>> https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/eclipsecon-admin/sessions/unprocessed?keys=&field_session_track_tid%5B%5D=10&field_session_track_tid%5B%5D=4&field_session_track_tid%5B%5D=5&field_session_track_tid%5B%5D=48&field_session_track_tid%5B%5D=9&field_session_track_tid%5B%5D=6&field_session_track_tid%5B%5D=7&field_session_track_tid%5B%5D=12&field_session_type_tid=19&field_accepted_value_1%5B%5D=0&field_accepted_value_1%5B%5D=1&field_accepted_value_1%5B%5D=2&field_session_pc_tags_tid%5B%5D=486
>> >
>> > --
>> > R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484
>> > http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
>> > eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
>> eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
>>
>
>
>
> --
> R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484
> http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource
>

Back to the top