[eclipsecon-na-program-committee] 57 talks selected

[Ian Bull <irbull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi everyone,

Thanks again for voting on the talks. You guys really are making my job a lot easier. 

I've gone through the tracks we talked about today, and then I continued to Lifecycle, Other, Modeling and RT. I accepted talks in these tracks will an average score >= 3.75. With this, we now have 57 talks.

e4/RCP: 8/15

RT: 7/10

Java: 4/10

C/C++: 3/5

JS Dev: 6/10

Modeling: 7/10

Lifecycle: 11/15

Other: 10/13

Regarding tutorials, I think we are close. Ian is going to contact the XText and RAP guys to see if they want to make their tutorials more general. Other than that, we need to decide which Jubula tutorial we want. Can you review your votes on [1,2]. In some ways, it might be nice to try the new Jubula tutorial [2], although, on other hand [1] is safe (it's been done several times before).

[1] https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/automating-tests-jubula

[2] https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/tutorial-cooking-jubula-junit-hudson-and-sonarqube-%E2%80%93-or-whatever-ingredients-you-have-hand

Also, we decided to only accept one of Andrew Low's talk [3,4]. Review your vote, and I'll just accept the one with the higher average score.

[3] https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/nodejs-powerpc-story-about-porting-nodejs-v8

[4] https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/_javascript_-performance-chrome-v8-and-nodejs

Cheers,

Ian

--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource