Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] suggested changes

[Ian Bull <irbull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Do you have links to these talks? I can't delete them, but if we all vote them down, they won't affect our decisions.

cheers

ian

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Lars Vogel <lars.vogel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Where are a few "withdrawn" talks. Can they be deleted?

Am 21.11.2013 16:41 schrieb "Pascal Rapicault" <pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

I noted the followings that could be moved from -> to

RCP -> Lifecycle
https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/takes-advantages-memory-analyzer-tool-inside-your-continuous-integration
Java -> RT
https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/case-study-semantic-versioning-large-existing-codebase
Java -> Lifecyce
https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/how-we-took-our-server-side-application-cloud-and-liked-what-we-got



On Thu, November 21, 2013 09:46, Ian Skerrett wrote:
> One more category change:
>
>
>
> 1.
> <https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/takes-advantages-memory-analyzer-
> tool-inside-your-continuous-integration> Takes advantages of Memory
> Analyzer
> Tool inside your Continuous Integration should be in Lifecycle tools not
> Eclipse RCP
>
>
>
>
>
> From: eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Ian Skerrett
> Sent: November-21-13 9:33 AM
> To: Eclipsecon NA program committee discussions
> Subject: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] suggested changes
>
>
>
> I went through the Cool Stuff category. I think some of the talks would be
> better suited in other tracks.
>
>
>
> 1.
> <https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/ui-performance-monitoring> UI
> Performance Monitoring  seems like a good candidate for Eclipse RCP/
> Eclipse
> 4
>
> 2.
> <https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/nasa-verve-interactive-3d-visuali
> zation-within-eclipse> NASA VERVE: interactive 3D visualization within
> Eclipse an RCP case study so move to Eclipse RCP/ Eclipse 4
>
> 3.
> <https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/eclipsecon-2014-hackathon> The
> EclipseCon 2014 Hackathon! This is a BOF. We don't have a BOF category yet
> but it should be reassigned.
>
> 4.
> <https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/being-amazon-software-developers-
> how-39-million-click-events-make-your-ide-smarter-place> Being Amazon for
> Software Developers. How 39 million click events make your IDE a smarter
> place.  This is a Code Recommenders talk so I think it would easily fit
> into
> Java development
>
> 5.
> <https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/prevent-three-eyed-fish-analyze-y
> our-nuclear-reactor-eclipse> Prevent Three-Eyed Fish: Analyze Your Nuclear
> Reactor with Eclipse this seems like a really good case study for Eclipse
> RCP so move to Eclipse RCP track.
>
> 6.
> <https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/session/built-scale-mozilla-release-engin
> eering-toolbox> Built to Scale: The Mozilla Release Engineering toolbox
> seems like a really good Lifecycle talk?
>
>
>
> I think there are more that could be moved. These ones had high votes so I
> suggest you move these into the other categories since I think they will
> be
> accepted in their new categories too.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
> eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
>


_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee

_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee

--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource