Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] November 29 morning update on selection

On Nov 29, 2012, at 4:54 PM, John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello, here is an update on our current state. Based on Cedric/Sven's feedback I have added the following three modeling talks:

http://www.eclipsecon.org/2013/sessions/emf-community-time-moving-eclipse4-thanks-extended-editing-framework-20
http://www.eclipsecon.org/2013/sessions/emfedit-force-unleashed
http://www.eclipsecon.org/2013/sessions/collaborative-modeling-applied-avionic-design-give-wings-your-team

Good! What about the others we proposed?
We are still low on DSL/Modeling (15 vs. 20 planned).

At least  


have higher votes than others having the 'in' tag (see below).


The problem is we are now at 69 accepted talks out of 68 :(  Here are three candidates to remove.

1) http://www.eclipsecon.org/2013/sessions/pushing-eclipse-extreme-lessons-breaking-ui-rules
2) http://www.eclipsecon.org/2013/sessions/lessons-restructuring-plugin-based-software
3) http://www.eclipsecon.org/2013/sessions/harder-better-faster-stronger-eclipse-4-rcp-applications-google-guava

Out of these, I am leaning towards removing 2)  but I would like your input. My current reasoning is that 1) is a good speaker and dealing with a subject that most people building Eclipse-based applications likely face. Also it is a subject that is not really covered by other talks from what I see. 3) is a cool outside Java project that adds some variety to the program so we are not purely looking "inside" at our own work. Having said that I don't know if Guava has had a lot of change in the past year so maybe it is old news. What do you guys think? Feel free to comment here and/or change your votes on those three.

I think we should remove all three, as they are all clearly below the 'line' now.
Also this one has lower votes than others:


Sven

Back to the top