Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] Bubble Selection

Well, part of the problem is calling it “Tools”. Tools is like half of what Eclipse is. A lot of talks there cross boundaries so I’m not too worried about how the allocations went.

 

:D

 

From: eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Arthorne
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 12:13 PM
To: Eclipsecon NA program committee discussions
Subject: Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] Bubble Selection

 

There is an early bird DSL selection so it is actually at 10. Modelling is definitely down, but it's good that we have the modelling symposium and EMF tutorial to help balance that. For me the toughest area has been Tools/Other where we were trying to fit 125 proposals into 18 slots.  I think next year the conference needs more rooms!

John


"Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

11/30/2011 10:17 AM

Please respond to
Eclipsecon NA program committee discussions        <eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To

"ian.skerrett@xxxxxxxxxxx" <ian.skerrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Eclipsecon NA        program committee discussions <eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>

cc

Subject

Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] Bubble Selection

 




With that break down, DSL currently has 9 and Modelling 6 + 1 on bubble. Neither are at 10.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [
mailto:eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Ian Skerrett
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 7:52 PM
> To: Eclipsecon NA program committee discussions
> Subject: Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] Bubble Selection
>
> Feel free to blame me for combing Modeling and DSL.  If it helps, DSL should
> get 10 talks and Modeling 10 talks.  Either way both are still under
> represented so I think it is valid to not add this talk to the bubble.
>
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sender: eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@eclipse.orgDate: Tue,
> 29 Nov 2011 17:49:49
> To: Eclipsecon NA program committee discussions<eclipsecon-na-program-
> committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: Eclipsecon NA program committee discussions
>                  <eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] Bubble Selection
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list eclipsecon-na-program-
> committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list eclipsecon-na-program-
> committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee


Back to the top